JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    VSB - In the Matter of Rhetta Moore Daniel - Virginia State Bar Docket No. 18-000-111751 Verified listing

    • Date
      April 9, 2018
    • City/County
      City of Richmond, Virginia
    • Type of Case
      Impairment Inquiry
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    VSB - In the Matter of Rhetta Moore Daniel - Virginia State Bar Docket No. 18-000-111751

    Case Number

    Virginia State Bar Docket No. 18-000-111751

    State or Country
    Virginia
    Judges

    NONE

    The Public is barred from all Virginia State Bar Impairment Hearings, and the VSB will not allow a Respondent to waive confidentiality.

    It is a Secret Process used by the VSB to ruin attorneys' lives and law practices which is held before a Star Chamber of non-judges.

    The Virginia State Bar Impairment Proceedings are not authorized by any Virginia Statute.

    The Virginia Stste Bar has the burden of proving the impairment of an attorney to practice law.

    There is no appeal allowed from VSB Impairment Summary Suspensions or any other determination or Order entered in Impairment cases even if the attorney is not impaired and the VSB cannot prove the attorney is impaired.

    The Virginia State Bar does not employ any judges and no Virginia judges are assigned to hear any cases that come before the Virginia State Bar at the District Committees or Disciplinary Board levels.

    The Virginia State Bar uses volunteers who are recommended by the Virginia State Bar Council, its elected governing body. The cases pending before the VSB District Committees or the VSB Discipliary Board are heard primarily by attorneys selected by the VSB who compete with the Respondents charged by the Viginia State Bar.

    There is NO appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court or to any other court from Summary Suspensions, Suspsension, Noncompliance Orders or Impairment Orders.

    The Virginia State Bar can select any attorney it wishes to charge with allegations of Impairment even if the VSB cannot meet it buden of proof and then summarily suspend that attorney's membership in the VSB cutting off the attorneye right to practice immediately and without warning.

    This Draconian Confidential process

    After a full hearing, the Virginia State Bar could not prove I was impaired and had no medical evidence or other evidence to rebut my espert medical doctors' reports and testimony or the testimony of clients, attorneys and others who knew my capabilities as an attorney.

    Therefore, the VSB Disciplinary Board entered two Orders in my case:

    1. Order that I sign Medical Releases for 5 years of my medical records from all my medical providers which are protected from disclousure by HIPAA and the US Consitution right to privacy and to submit to an independent medical examination by a doctor the VSB would choose; and

    2. Order of Noncomplinace when I would not sign Medical Releases for the VSB to get all of my medical records for 5 years from all my medical providers and submit to an "Independent" medical examination conducted by a physician chosen by the Virginia State Bar.

    I had no appeal.

    I had not Client Complaints for 41 years. All allegations in the specious Impaiarment case came from competing, opposing attorneys and judges who were cooperating with the opposing attorneys and parties.

    My las practice and income was abruptly ended.

    Some of my clients were left with no representation and still do not have any representation in very compllicated cases in which they now have suffered significant harm as pro se parties.

    There was and is no judtice when you are accused by the Virginia State Bar, supposedly by your opposing attorneys and cooperative judges who did not even testify.

    I had no opportunity to comfront or examine my accusers at any point in the Impairment process because the Virginia State Bar did not call any of the accusers, if there were any, as witnesses.

    I could not appeal even to the Virginia Supreme Ccurt of which the Virginia State Bar is an administrative agency.

    Defendant

    Rhetta M. Daniel, Esquire
    3420 Pump Road, # 170
    Richmond, VA 23233

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Virginia State Bar
    Asst. Bar Counsel Elizabeth Shoenfeld, Esquire
    1111 E. Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23291

    Arbitrators

    None.

    Intervener

    None.

    CPS

    None

    Sherrif

    None

    Others that affected your case

    All my clients.
    My family.
    Attorneys who had retained me as an expert witness in legal malpractice cases in Virginia and other states.

    Judges Comments

    None

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.academia.edu/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=Rhetta+M.+Daniel

    Date
    April 9, 2018
    Type of Case
    Impairment Inquiry
    The Court the Case was filed in

    Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board

    County/City:
    City of Richmond, Virginia
    Clerk of Court

    Clerk of the Virginia State Bar
    Davida Davis
    1111 East Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Plaintiff

    Virginia State Bar
    1111 East Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Defendant Attorney

    Jeffrey Geiger, Esquire - https://www.sandsanderson.com/attorneys/jeffrey-hamilton-geiger/
    Sands Anderson PC
    1111 E. Main Street, Suite 2400
    Richmond, VA 23219

    P: (804) 648-1636
    F: (804) 783-7291

    Mediators

    None.

    Guardian

    None

    Doctors

    Mecial Expert Witnesses in the field of Psychiatry, Internal Medicine and Cardiology

    Police

    None

    Comments

    In the United States no one is supposed to have their livlihood cut off without a right of appeal.

    The Virginia State Bar can take a lawyer's livelihood and ruin the lawyer's reputation in Secret Proceedings behind locked doors and the attorney has no appeal or other legal challenge to the Star Chamber proceedings or the Virginia State Bar suspending the attorney''s membership in the VSB.

    Without an active status in good standing in the Virginia State Bar, an attorney cannot practice law in Virginia even when the attorney still has a valid Virginia law license.

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    JUDGES CAN BE SUED & DOJ SUES Maryland FEDERAL JUDGES Verified listing

    • U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore)
    • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:25-cv-02029-TTC
    • CRIMINAL
    • Judge Thomas T Cullen

    PETITION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIGH CRIMES,N MISDEMEANORS, AND OTHER SERIOUS BREACHES OF PUBLIC TRUST Verified listing

    • Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • TBD
    • Impeachment of Justice Roberts
    • TBD
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link