“Political” / “Cash” Courts vs. “Constitutional” Courts

All Across America we have seen Peaceful Marches & Rioting

Today JudicialPedia addresses the issue  of the Courts

The Marches & Riots have gone after the Police when in Truth it is the entire Judiciary that is Broken

JUDICIALPEDIA gives a “VOICE” to those denied Justice in the Courts

On or around November 30, 2017 “Made Up” charges were filed against General Michael T. Flynn


This case is being highlighted because each person who has had a conflict in the courts can relate to something in this case.

The United States of America “FBI” and the “DOJ” created an issue to marginalize,  using Fear of his son being set up, and the lawyers’ costs,  to force General Flynn to settle – to stop the threats on him and his family.

To win today in court it is with Money and or Power.  To keep this system alive takes a lot of money. 

Lawyers and Judges are getting that money through Criminal activity, Forfeiture, Guardianships, and Divorces et al.

In Florida, you have two other cases similar to General Flynn’s  Roger Stone & Karyn Turk and in Virginia, you have Janice Wolk Grenadier.

The Department of Justice and other agencies have a TRILLION Dollar Slush fund, as do the Police and local communities from Forfeitures and Fines they take in return for not putting people of “Power” or “Wealth” in jail.

The Banks in America today with the Servicers in the Foreclosure SCAM now are foreclosing on “FAKE” Mortgage Back Securities.  With Wells Fargo, this is no different than the “FAKE” Bank Accounts you saw them creating.  Servicers like OCWEN no longer have many employees in the United States as they can be held accountable, but have the majority of the servicing in India as this way they can by all appearance “Cover-Up” using “FAKE” attorney bar numbers on documents, not answering the phone and or with turning off the “FAX” machine to prevent a homeowner from sending documents in a timely manner.  This is done at the demand by all appearances of the Foreclosing Lawyers.



                                                         UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  Vs.    MICHAEL T.  FLYNN  /   CRIM. Case No.  17-232 EGS


JUDGE EMMET G. SULLIVAN in his Oversight as a Judge

Creates the Question are the Courts in the United States of America

 “POLITICAL” Courts, “CASH” Courts  or “CONSTITUTIONAL” Courts


Should Judge Emmet G. Sullivan RECUSE HIMSELF as Judge of the CRIM. Case. No.  17-232 EGS due to an  “OBVIOUS BIAS” for all appearances for Political Favor against General Flynn.  Judge Sullivan has a pattern & practice of doing this as he did it to Janice Wolk Grenadier for other reasons than political but is no different.  That  the  “Judge’s Secret Society” to protect their own is in full force in the General Flynn case. 


1.    That Judge Sullivan has acted in extrinsic Fraud on the Court. “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are “VOID”, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” “Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.” “State court and Federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)”


2.    Judge Sullivan, an officer of the court, has been allowed to ignore the law and rules of the Supreme Court of the United States of America “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.” Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)”


3.    “Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. “In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)” No judge should ever rule by Favoritism and Cronyism for the sake of Personal Retaliation and Retribution. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated against because the Judge’s, lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of their race or social hierarchy. That the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.     


Judge Sullivan’s acts and actions are obvious acts of Bias against General Flynn.    

supreme court

Chief Justice Roberts Statement – Nomination Process Stated:


“…Judges and Justices are servants of the law, not the other way around.  Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical.  They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role.  Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire.

Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath, and judges have to have the modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench.

Mr. Chairman, when I worked in the Department of Justice in the Office of the Solicitor General, it was my job to argue cases for the United States before the Supreme Court.  I always found it very moving to stand before the Justices and say, “I speak for my country.” But it was after I left the Department and began arguing cases against the United States, that I fully appreciated the importance of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system.  Here was the United States, the most powerful entity in the world, aligned against my client, and yet all I had to do was convince the Court that I was right on the law, and the Government was wrong, and all that power and might would recede in deference to the rule of law.

That is a remarkable thing.


 It is what we mean when we say that we are a Government of laws and not of men.  It is that rule of law that protects the rights and liberties of all Americans.  It is the envy of the world, because without the rule of law, any rights are meaningless.”

“…Judges are not politicians who can promise to do certain things in exchange for votes.  I have no agenda, but I do have a commitment.  If I am confirmed, I will confront every case with an open mind.  I will fully and fairly analyze the legal arguments that are presented.  I will be open to the considered views of my colleagues on the bench, and I will decide every case based on the record, according to the rule of law, without fear or favor, to the best of my ability, and I will remember that it’s my job to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.






 “we are cleaning up our Judges, that Judges are “Umpires calling balls and strikes”  Judges are not Jurors”  and Judge Sulliven  in this Order on or around May 12, 2020  acted as “GOD”, “JURY” and with OBVIOUS KNOWLEDGEABLE BIAS TO PROTECT by appearance POLITICAL “FRIENDS”.    It appears JUDGE SULLIVAN is using RETALIATION of General Flynn’s rights to redress the courts. How many others feel the same thing has happened to them in the courts?



In Support of General Flynn


  1. On May 6, 2020, Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG)  Intervened as many have done in the past in support of General Flynn.  That the Intervene was not docketed.  Tampering with Legal documents and the Docket is a Crime.


  1. On May 7, 2020,  the DOJ filed to have the case Dismissed.


  1. That on or around May 12, 2020, Judge Sullivan decided he wasn’t going to drop the case.  He would allow anyone that felt that General Flynn had “lied” to Intervene in support of him being found guilty. 


  1. On May 13, 2020,  JWG filed a Motion for Judge Emmet Sullivan to Recuse.  You can read it at:  https://www.scribd.com/document/461264734/Judge-Emmet-Sullivan-Recuse-Filed-May-13-2020


Judge Sullivan by the Judicial Code of conduct is only held to a few rules:

Substance of the Model of Code of Judicial Conduct of Judges


            Canon 1: A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

            Canon 2: A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s activities.

           Canon 3: A judge shall perform the duties of the judicial office impartially and diligently.

          Canon 4: A judge shall so conduct the judge’s extrajudicial activities to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations.

           Canon 5: A judge or judicial candidate shall refrain from inappropriate political activity.


The appearance and the FACTS show he has violated the above Cannons. Read more about the Judicial Canons:  https://ballotpedia.org/Codes_and_Canons_of_Judicial_Conduct

Judge Sullivan has not followed the Judicial Canons by all appearances as he is showing Bias toward those who support an opinion he wants as the outcome of the case instead of Justice.   

“Justice delayed is Justice denied”



Federal JUDGE EMMIT SULLIVAN in the General Flynn Case hired “Friend” high-powered D.C. attorney Beth Wilkinson to defend his actions in the General Flynn case.   Sullivan pushed off Barr’s request and paused Flynn’s case to invite outside groups and a retired federal judge to argue against the Justice Department’s proposal.

Sullivan also asked retired New York Judge John Gleeson to examine whether Flynn may have committed perjury while pleading guilty to lying about his pre-inauguration contacts with Russia’s ambassador.  Flynn’s lawyer then accused Sullivan of bias and asked the U.S. Court of Appeals to intervene. Judge Gleeson, it appears, had already voiced his opinions of the case in the press et al. 

 The appearance is Judge Gleeson was chosen with knowledgeable intent by Judge Sullivan for an outcome he personally wanted.

How Much will Gleeson & Wilkinson be paid by United States Citizens?  For an outcome in court that Judge Sullivan wants for his “FRIENDS”.     This is what they do in courts in CHINA & now here in America.




United States of America’s citizens will pay for the past United States District Court of the District of Columbia Chief Justice Richard Roberts for the rest of his life for RAPING A 16-year-old VICTIM. By all appearance a colleague that Judge Sullivan could have also helped to “Cover Up”.  You can read more at:   https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lawsuit-accuses-chief-federal-judge-d-c-raping-minor-n540556 

Ms. Mitchell fought for 30 years to get justice. 




Justice Antonin Scalia passed in Texas after flying out on Air Force 2 with Dick Cheney, the trip paid for by lawyers/friends who had two cases in front of him.  The Supreme Court has approx. 10,000 cases a year filed and takes approx. 80 cases.  It is also reported this was done 144 times and is a pattern and practice.  Read more:  https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/27/us/politics/scalia-led-court-in-taking-trips-funded-by-private-sponsors.html



Chief Supreme Court  Justice Cynthia Kinser who the State of Virginia will by all appearances be paid her retirement as she works full time as a lawyer, after letting Michael Gardner out of jail.  Gardner was found guilty of molesting young girls, but being a good fundraiser for those in “POWER” he got out of jail.  The Appeals Court of Virginia denied him a new trial, while the Supreme Court agreed to a new trial and let him out of jail to await the trial.  Gardner then attempted to hire a HITMAN to KILL THE YOUNG GIRLS.  After the FBI had a private meeting with the Virginia Legislature Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser retired early.



Maybe one of the worst “Cash for Kids” in Pennsylvania where “one”  mother STOOD UP and STATED “NO MORE”.  The Judge is in jail and using any type of excuse i.e. technical error to try and get out of jail. Kids For Cash: When Judges Took Bribes To Dish Out Harsh Sentences To Juvenile Offenders.  Former Luzerne County Judges Mark Ciavarella (left) and Michael Conahan (right) were convicted in 2011 of taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send youth offenders to for-profit detention facilities. They are pictured leaving the federal courthouse in Scranton, Pa. in February 2009. You can read more:   https://jlc.org/luzerne-kids-cash-scandal




Judge Henry E. Hudson wrote a book called the “Quest for Justice”  From Deputy Sheriff to Federal Judge.  On page 321 he writes “I lied to the General Assembly and the Fairfax County Bar Association when I told them unequivocally that I had no intention of seeking a federal judgeship


Further down he states “Federal Judgeships are sometimes jokingly called the last vestige of aristocracy in the United States. Because they are a lifetime appointment with full pay and benefits until the day you die, the competition can be tough.  Although appointees must have good legal credentials, political pedigree is essential.” Page 322


Hudson states how in Virginia “my law clerk Julie Grossman and I were able to accomplish the task relatively easily, in about two days”.  So the State of Virginia paid for his law clerk to put together his Federal application.  Judge Hudson was also the head of his club “The Hookers” made up of Judges, Sheriffs his “Ole Boy Network” Virginia Friends.


 Hudson was also in charge at the time of Ruby Ridge, Idaho fugitive Randy Weaver. The question is how many people lost their lives harmed due to his acts and actions?  The book leaves you wondering that, and how many others like Janice Wolk Grenadier he harmed just for his friends and his own sick jollies?  This is the type of people we have as Judges in the FEDERAL Courts. 




Chief Judge Donald Haddock  / Judge James Clark / Judge Nolan Dawkins of the City of Alexandria with the help of  Chief Justice Donald Lemons, Judge Thomas Padrick and many others of Virginia have colluded and ensured that Janice Wolk Grenadier  (JWG) could never get a “FAIR” trial.


 In May of 2008 Judge Donald Haddock after picking all  JWG Judges stated “You will never get a fair trial as we “LOVE LOVE LOVE” Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman”.  He then showed up again in August of 2019 to have a conversation with Judge Thomas Padrick to insure that Janice Wolk Grenadier could not / would not get a fair trial and justice,  – for his “LOVE, LOVE, LOVE” of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. Read more at VALaw2010.blogspot.com   This portrait in or around 2012 was purchased  with donations from Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the lawyers/firms that represented her and David Mark Grenadier in or with their divorce DiMuroGinsberg P.C.(Ben DiMuro, Judge John Tran, Andera Moseley), Parker, Simon & Kokolis (Heba Carter)


We will be adding other Judges Story’s to JudgesPedia.com in the future on the “Wall of Shame”.




“When you confess to a crime you did not commit because you can not afford to fight the government” 



The Judicial system is broken and those that are financially benefiting are the Government & those that work in the Judiciary or have the POWER.  Justice is for “SALE” in America. 


Judges believe they are above the law.  THE CONFLICT here is they use cases, that  JUDGES DECIDED to protect themselves from being held accountable even when they know they are WRONG.  THAT Judges immunity comes from other Judges. The problem in this country with our Judges is they must POLICE THEMSELVES and the Elected Officials and agencies that are to hold them accountable are Lawyers who are put into place to “COVER UP” the criminal mis-justice by JUDGES.   


It takes courage to call out a JUDGE.  But, today JWG believes her  TRASH Collectors have more integrity than most Judges.  Nowhere in 42 U.S.C. 1983  does it state that a Judge is immune.  Only Judges believe they are IMMUNE from the Law and Accountability, again it is the Judicial Abuse that President Trump acknowledged that helped get him elected. That Judicial Discretion does not include ABUSE OF POWER.


The Question all Judges should be concerned about is Will they become the next Harvey Weinstein SCANDAL for the ABUSE OF POWER, the Smoke and Mirrors of Absolute Immunity? 


JUDGES do not get to ignore the law to protect their own. It was stated clearly at the Federalist’s event the ABA is a corrupt entity.  Judicial Abusive Acts and Actions of POWER make Judges’ Judicial rape worse than Physical Rape as they are EMPOWERED by so many.    RAPE BY JUDGES LAST LONGER and IS a LONGER LASTING TRAUMA


When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of a clearly valid statute expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost., Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F2d, cer den Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S..Ct 2020 451 U.S. 939, 68L.Ed 2d 326.  In Rankin v. Howard 633 F.2d 844 (1980) the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary impunity prongs were absent; later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1972 (1986), the Ninth Circuit, en banc, criticized the “judicial nature” analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive.  But Rankin’s ultimate result wasn’t changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction.


THE ONLY PEOPLE who believe Judges are above the law and have ABSOLUTE JUDICIAL IMMUNITY are JUDGES  and it is Judges who have created this Smoke and Mirrors that they are above the law.  Further, it is the Elected Officials and Lawyers who turn the other way to empower it – with the silence because of the Retribution and Retaliation Judges use as Judge Sullivan is doing with General Flynn.


Where Judicial Immunity came from Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), is the leading United States Supreme Court decision on judicial immunity. It involved an Indiana judge who was sued by a young woman who had been sterilized without her knowledge as a minor in accordance with the judge’s order. The Supreme Court held that the judge was immune from being sued for issuing the order because it was issued as a judicial function. The case has been called one of the most controversial in recent Supreme Court history.


That JUSTICE has no time limit.  That the Judiciary, the Government, and the Elected Officials protect one of their own is obvious, is clear they wish to minimize U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of a Felony and ignore an FBI et al criminal spree.  


That we all must stand together, and add your case so the World can see what your Judge and or others did to you.  That Judges have no respect for you – But, you must walk into the courtroom kissing his or her feet for mercy, even when you have the “TRUTH” in your corner.