JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    Zachary Jordan Alam - Freedom Fighter Verified listing

    • Date
      January 6, 2021
    • City/County
      Washington DC
    • Type of Case
      Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, charged: 18 U.S.C. §§ 11 l(a) and (b) - Assault on a Federal Officer with a Dangerous or Deadly Weapon 18 U.S.C. § 1361 - Destmction ofGovemment Property over $1 ,000 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)- Obstmction ofan Official Proceeding 18 U.S.C. §§ l 752(a) and (b) - Unlawful Entty on Restricted Building or Grounds 40 U.S.C. §§ 5104(e)(2)(D), (F) and (G) - Violent Entty and Disorderly Conduct
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Zachary Jordan Alam - Freedom Fighter

    Case Number

    Case 1:21-cr-00190-DLF

    State or Country
    District of Columbia
    Judges

    Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

    Defendant

    Zachary Jordan Alam

    Case Number:
    1:21-cr-190
    Charge(s):
    Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers; Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers Using a Dangerous Weapon; Civil Disorder and Aiding and Abetting; Destruction of Government Property Exceeding $1,000; Obstruction of an Official Proceeding and Aiding and Abetting; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building with a Deadly or Dangerous Weapon; Engaging in Physical Violence in a Restricted Building with a Deadly or Dangerous Weapon; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Act of Physical Violence in the Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in Capitol

    Location of Arrest:
    Pennsylvania, Eastern District
    Case Status:
    Arrested 1/30/21. Indicted 3/5/21 and made initial appearance on 3/29/21.

    Arraigned 4/13/21 and pleaded not guilty to all counts.

    Superseding indictment filed 11/10. Arraigned and pleaded not guilty to all counts on 12/6.

    Case Documents:
    Alam, Zachary - Complaint & Affidavit
    Alam - Indictment
    Alam Superseding Indictment

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Mathew M. Grieves

    Candice Chiu Wong
    (202) 252-7849
    U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia
    555 Fourth St., NW
    Washington, DC 20530
    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
    LEAD ATTORNEY

    Social Networks
    • Website
    • Website
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Website
    Date
    January 6, 2021
    Type of Case
    Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, charged: 18 U.S.C. §§ 11 l(a) and (b) - Assault on a Federal Officer with a Dangerous or Deadly Weapon 18 U.S.C. § 1361 - Destmction ofGovemment Property over $1 ,000 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)- Obstmction ofan Official Proceeding 18 U.S.C. §§ l 752(a) and (b) - Unlawful Entty on Restricted Building or Grounds 40 U.S.C. §§ 5104(e)(2)(D), (F) and (G) - Violent Entty and Disorderly Conduct
    The Court the Case was filed in

    U.S. District of Court of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) The Civil Rights Court of the United States of America

    County/City:
    Washington DC
    Plaintiff

    United States of America

    Defendant Attorney

    Michael E. Lawlor
    (301) 474-0044
    Fax: (301) 474-5730
    Brennan, McKenna & Lawlor, Chartered
    6305 Ivy Lane
    Suite 700
    Greenbelt, MD 20770

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    LEAD ATTORNEY

    Nicholas George Madiou
    (301) 474-0044
    Fax: (301) 474-5730
    Brennan, McKenna & Lawlor, Chartered
    6305 Ivy Lane
    Suite 700
    Greenbelt, MD 20770

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Comments

    https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/LIVE-Reps-Gaetz-Gosar-Gohmert-and-MTG-visit-Jan-6th-Pol-Prisoners-Corrections-Facility/5-2473936/?page=3&anc=bottom#bottom

    Everyone knows they're innocent until proven guilty, I'm just correcting the claim that they were charged with trespassing. They were people charged with trespassing, but they were released, and the ones who plead guilty so far got slapped on the wrists.

    The guys being held in jail are charged with serious felonies, in most cases serious crimes of violence.

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    JUDGES CAN BE SUED & DOJ SUES Maryland FEDERAL JUDGES Verified listing

    • U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore)
    • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:25-cv-02029-TTC
    • CRIMINAL
    • Judge Thomas T Cullen

    PETITION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIGH CRIMES,N MISDEMEANORS, AND OTHER SERIOUS BREACHES OF PUBLIC TRUST Verified listing

    • Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • TBD
    • Impeachment of Justice Roberts
    • TBD
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link