JudicialPedia Logo
    • Explore
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case

    11-12-2015 USDC of Virginia 1:15-cv- 01497 GBL - IDD Rico & Racketeering Judges ruled for the "LOVE LOVE LOVE" that Judge DONALD HADDOCK has for DIVORCE LAWYER ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN

    • Date
      November 11, 2015
    • City/County
      City of Alexandria
    • Type of Case
      Rico & Racketeering 1. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986); 2. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18 U.S.C. § 1962); 3. FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. § 1125); 3. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. § 2201); 5.. LIBEL AND SLANDER 6.. FALSE IMPRISONMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    11-12-2015 USDC of Virginia 1:15-cv- 01497 GBL - IDD Rico & Racketeering Judges ruled for the "LOVE LOVE LOVE" that Judge DONALD HADDOCK has for DIVORCE LAWYER ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN

    Date
    November 11, 2015
    State or Country
    Virginia
    County/City:
    City of Alexandria
    The Court the Case was filed in

    USDC of the Eastern Division of Virginia (Alexandria)

    Type of Case
    Rico & Racketeering 1. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986); 2. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18 U.S.C. § 1962); 3. FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. § 1125); 3. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. § 2201); 5.. LIBEL AND SLANDER 6.. FALSE IMPRISONMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
    Case Number

    1:15-cv- 01497 GBL - IDD

    Judges

    Corrupt Judges
    Judge Gerald Bruce Lee
    Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis

    Plaintiff

    Janice Wolk Grenadier

    Defendant

    United States of America
    C/O Attorney General Loretta Lynch
    Department of Justice
    Washington, DC

    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (VA)
    C/O Office of Attorney General
    Mark Herring
    900 East Main Street
    Richmond, VA 23219

    CITY OF ALEXANDRIA (COA)
    C/O City Attorney
    310 King Street
    Alexandria, VA 22314

    GRENADIER STARCE DUFFETT & KIESER PC
    649 South Washington Street
    Alexandria VA 2214

    DIMUROGINSBERG PC
    1101 King Street Suite 600
    Alexandria, VA 22314

    MICHAEL WIESER ESQ
    510 King Street #416
    Alexandria, VA 22314

    REED SMITH

    RICH ROSENTHAL BRINEFIELD
    MANITTA DZUBIN & KROGER LLP
    210 Union Street
    Alexandria, VA 22314

    BWW LAW GROUP
    2101 Wilson Blvd. Ste 402
    Arlington VA 22201

    Troutman Pepper aka TROUTMAN SANDERS
    AKA MAYS & VALENTINE
    1850 Towers Crescent Plaza Suite 500
    Tysons Corner, VA 22182

    PARKER, SIMON & KOKOLIS, LLC
    110 N. Washington Street Suite 500
    Rockville, MD 20850

    KELLERHECKMAN
    Jerome (Jerry) Heckman
    Washington, DC

    VIRGINIA STATE BAR

    NEIL GURVITCH ESQ / WECHELER, SELZER & GURVITCH, CHARTED
    4550 Montgomery Ave Suite 900 N
    Bethesda,, MD 20814

    ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN
    4200 Massachusetts Ave Apt 410
    Washington DC 20016-4752
    igrenadier@vafamilylaw.com

    DAVID MARK GRENADIER
    Silver Spring, Maryland

    ERIKA ELY LEWIS
    Los Angeles California

    JOHN DOE
    JANE DOE

    Defendants – AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER OF
    THE COURT

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Pro Se

    Defendant Attorney

    The Defendants never had to get attorneys "Judge Bruce Lee" took care of it for his friends

    Judges Comments

    The Judges in State & Federal Court all ruled in favor for the LOVE LOVE LOVE that Judge Donald Haddock sr. had for Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. You have to remember Federal Judges come from the State System and more favor for a Federal Judgship is owed

    The Judges owed favor

    That Judges rule on Money, Power, Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, Sex, LOVE LOVE LOVE, Friendship, Bias, their own Retirement funds, a weekend getaway, $ change hands in golf games, the Inn at Little Washington dinner, hunting / fishing trips et al

    Comments

    VERIFIED COMPLAINT/CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS 18 USC 241 & 242, USC
    1983 ILLEGAL ACTIONS TO DENY ACCESS TO GRAND JURY, FALSE IMPRESSEMENT, SLANDER,
    LIBEL, FRAUD ON THE COURT/ TREASON, VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVILRIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42
    U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986);. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18
    U.S.C. § 1962); FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. §1125); DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. §
    2201); MOTION FOR HARASSMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER (18 U.S.C. § 1514(b))

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Verified Complaint

    COMES NOW Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier (Janice) reserves the right to amend Complaint and add
    additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier complains against the captioned
    Defendants as follows: to seek relief for the violation of Federal and Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S
    Code §1981 &1983, Title 18 U.S. Code § 241 & 242 and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are
    being Violated:

    1. Freedom of speech
    2. Freedom of worship
    3. Freedom from want
    4. Freedom from fear

    To include the illegal imprisonment of Janice Wolk Grenadier from October 22, 2014 through November 12,
    2014. Where the City of Alexandria, the State of Virginia used warfare torture to further harass and intimidate with the appearance of the hope of her committing suicide or killing her. That the obvious intentions in the Cover-up of the Criminal Acts of Senator Mark Warner and Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman are the reasons for the imprisonment.

    That since 2007 Plaintiff to her face from Judges or representatives of the Judges have said to
    Plaintiff “You cannot win this we LOVE Ilona”, (Chief Judge Donald Haddock) (Ilona Grenadier Heckman
    founding partner of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet&Keisler PC is who Judge Haddock “LOVES”) “Me
    and My family cannot get a fair trial either, you cannot win this you are no longer one of them” (x-wife of Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock) The Dockets shows it would at times take the Judges in the City of Alexandria over 2 ½ months to find a Judge who would rule in favor of Ilona an attorney lying in court, lying in court documents, theft of funds through her law firm the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and her girls, bullying and threatening Plaintiff, involved in forgery, hate of Catholics / Christians, gang-like activity mirror imaging the Klue Klux Klan, Not once has Plaintiff lost because she does not have the Law on her side, it is because of discrimination – religious / social / economic / hierarchy by the Defendants to protect one of their own.

    Further Claims are outlined in this complaint.

    DEMAND TRIAL BY JURY

    INTRODUCTION

    COMES NOW that on September 12, 2007 Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer founding partner of
    Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett& Keiser PC, widow to Judge Albert Grenadier of the City of
    Alexandria and his 1st cousin Jerome Heckman, founding partner of Keller Heckman an International
    law firm LIED IN COURT. The Slippery Slope of the Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
    and Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic and Hierarchy, the Gang type behavior
    similar to the Klu Klux Klan – the Collusion of the Defendants began to cover up the Lies, the
    attempt to harm Plaintiff and her girls American Born Citizens through drugs and rape, to
    Slander Plaintiff, to prevent Due Process. The purpose of the Old Boys Network and the Judiciary
    is to prevent one of their own Ilona Grenadier Heckman from being held accountable for:
    Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of
    Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image to the Klue Klux Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest – related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, Social, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES OF
    PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights
    under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42
    U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC § 912. With her
    Intention to 18 USC § 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious
    behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, § 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Judicial
    Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity;

    Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al. not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a corrupt
    purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the law; Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal errors; Violation
    of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will
    and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of
    Plaintiff.
    This case started out a domestic issue, T0DAY THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE, the right of
    access to the courts to a pro se litigant without having their life threatened and being Jailed
    by the Collusion, Racketeering of the Judicial Community. That the Judicial Community polices
    itself, that Plaintiff has gone through all channels for help, to be turned away. The Judicial Community
    has created a smoke and mirrors of Immunity that they have tried to force on the American people, to
    believe that they are above the law and cannot be held responsible for their actions in the court room.
    This is untrue. That the immunity is lost for actions that are for personnel gain, that are willful acts
    that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless. That
    Discrimination is color blind that there is discrimination for social, economic and hierarch that exists in
    the Judicial Community to protect one of their own. That cases across this Great Country Judges and
    the Judicial Community are being held accountable for their actions as Judges going to jail for
    Obstruction of Justice et al.
    "Pro se plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements. Recognizing this,
    the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se complaints liberally and to
    apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro se complaint than they would in
    reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct.
    173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct.
    594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d
    Cir.1989) (per curiam). In order to justify the dismissal of a pro se complaint, it must be "
    'beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would
    entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v.
    Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/68ok7fo9g9kry9x49xehs/RicoRaci-2-V-4-FINAL-JWG-V-Complaint-October-17-2015.docx?dl=0&rlkey=h2npwc7yvftv0wctd6edb5ed9

    Document Link 2

    https://www.scribd.com/document/470403079/USDC-VA-Exhibits-for-Rico-Rackering-Jan-6-2015

    Document Link 3

    https://www.scribd.com/document/303506666/RicoRaci-2-v-4-FINAL-JWG-v-Complaint-October-17-2015#download

  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Breach of Ethics Complaint v. US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Judges, Richmond Division

    • United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Richmond Division
    • 19-9512
    • Attorney Misconduct Disciplinary Case
    • Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Judge G. Steven Agee, Judge Toby J. Heytens, & Senior Judge Barbara Milano Keenan

    ***WERE YOU A VICTIM OF MERS MORTAGE MAFIA?*** Complete MERS Membership List -HERE!!! https://www.scribd.com/document/573004018/MERS-Membership-List-as-of-5-22-16

    • N/A
    • COMPLETE COMPANY MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY OF MERS!
    • TBD

    MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - US FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

    • United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Richmond Division
    • 19-9512
    • Attorney Reciprocal Disciplinary Case
    • N/A
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link