11-12-2015 USDC of Virginia 1:15-cv- 01497 GBL - IDD Rico & Racketeering Judges ruled for the "LOVE LOVE LOVE" that Judge DONALD HADDOCK has for DIVORCE LAWYER ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN

VERIFIED COMPLAINT/CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS 18 USC 241 & 242, USC
1983 ILLEGAL ACTIONS TO DENY ACCESS TO GRAND JURY, FALSE IMPRESSEMENT, SLANDER,
LIBEL, FRAUD ON THE COURT/ TREASON, VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVILRIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42
U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986);. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18
U.S.C. § 1962); FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. §1125); DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. §
2201); MOTION FOR HARASSMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER (18 U.S.C. § 1514(b))

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Verified Complaint

COMES NOW Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier (Janice) reserves the right to amend Complaint and add
additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier complains against the captioned
Defendants as follows: to seek relief for the violation of Federal and Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S
Code §1981 &1983, Title 18 U.S. Code § 241 & 242 and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are
being Violated:

1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom of worship
3. Freedom from want
4. Freedom from fear

To include the illegal imprisonment of Janice Wolk Grenadier from October 22, 2014 through November 12,
2014. Where the City of Alexandria, the State of Virginia used warfare torture to further harass and intimidate with the appearance of the hope of her committing suicide or killing her. That the obvious intentions in the Cover-up of the Criminal Acts of Senator Mark Warner and Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman are the reasons for the imprisonment.

That since 2007 Plaintiff to her face from Judges or representatives of the Judges have said to
Plaintiff “You cannot win this we LOVE Ilona”, (Chief Judge Donald Haddock) (Ilona Grenadier Heckman
founding partner of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet&Keisler PC is who Judge Haddock “LOVES”) “Me
and My family cannot get a fair trial either, you cannot win this you are no longer one of them” (x-wife of Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock) The Dockets shows it would at times take the Judges in the City of Alexandria over 2 ½ months to find a Judge who would rule in favor of Ilona an attorney lying in court, lying in court documents, theft of funds through her law firm the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and her girls, bullying and threatening Plaintiff, involved in forgery, hate of Catholics / Christians, gang-like activity mirror imaging the Klue Klux Klan, Not once has Plaintiff lost because she does not have the Law on her side, it is because of discrimination – religious / social / economic / hierarchy by the Defendants to protect one of their own.

Further Claims are outlined in this complaint.

DEMAND TRIAL BY JURY

INTRODUCTION

COMES NOW that on September 12, 2007 Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer founding partner of
Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett& Keiser PC, widow to Judge Albert Grenadier of the City of
Alexandria and his 1st cousin Jerome Heckman, founding partner of Keller Heckman an International
law firm LIED IN COURT. The Slippery Slope of the Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
and Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic and Hierarchy, the Gang type behavior
similar to the Klu Klux Klan – the Collusion of the Defendants began to cover up the Lies, the
attempt to harm Plaintiff and her girls American Born Citizens through drugs and rape, to
Slander Plaintiff, to prevent Due Process. The purpose of the Old Boys Network and the Judiciary
is to prevent one of their own Ilona Grenadier Heckman from being held accountable for:
Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of
Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image to the Klue Klux Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest – related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, Social, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights
under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42
U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC § 912. With her
Intention to 18 USC § 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious
behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, § 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Judicial
Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity;

Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al. not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a corrupt
purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the law; Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal errors; Violation
of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will
and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of
Plaintiff.
This case started out a domestic issue, T0DAY THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE, the right of
access to the courts to a pro se litigant without having their life threatened and being Jailed
by the Collusion, Racketeering of the Judicial Community. That the Judicial Community polices
itself, that Plaintiff has gone through all channels for help, to be turned away. The Judicial Community
has created a smoke and mirrors of Immunity that they have tried to force on the American people, to
believe that they are above the law and cannot be held responsible for their actions in the court room.
This is untrue. That the immunity is lost for actions that are for personnel gain, that are willful acts
that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless. That
Discrimination is color blind that there is discrimination for social, economic and hierarch that exists in
the Judicial Community to protect one of their own. That cases across this Great Country Judges and
the Judicial Community are being held accountable for their actions as Judges going to jail for
Obstruction of Justice et al.
"Pro se plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements. Recognizing this,
the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se complaints liberally and to
apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro se complaint than they would in
reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct.
173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct.
594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d
Cir.1989) (per curiam). In order to justify the dismissal of a pro se complaint, it must be "
'beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would
entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v.
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).