Sign in or Register
Add Case
    • Explore
      arrow_drop_down
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      arrow_drop_down
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case

    California James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California

    • Date
      June 11, 2020
    • City/County
      County of Sutter, Yuba City, CA
    • Type of Case
      Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud Ruled Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    California James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California

    Date
    June 11, 2020
    State or Country
    California
    County/City:
    County of Sutter, Yuba City, CA
    The Court the Case was filed in

    Superior Court of California, County of Sutter

    Type of Case
    Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud Ruled Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.
    Case Number

    CVCS20-0912

    Judges

    Honorable Sarah H. Heckman Judge of the Superior Court
    Judge Perry Parker,

    Plaintiff

    JAMES GALLAGHER et al.,

    Defendant

    GAVIN NEWSOM, as Governor, etc.,

    Plaintiff Attorney

    James Gallagher, in pro. per., and Kevin Kiley, in pro. per., for Real Parties in
    Interest.

    Defendant Attorney

    Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson, Assistant Attorney
    General, Benjamin M. Glickman, Jay C. Russell and John W. Killeen, Deputy Attorneys
    General, for Petitioner.

    Comments

    Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Website
    • Website
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://ad03.asmrc.org/sites/default/files/files-uploaded/TRO.pdf%20%20

    mood_bad
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Innocent Thursday, May 24, 2012 , Brian Kieth Banks weeps after his rape conviction was dismissed in court in Long Beach, Calif. Banks, 34, was a standout high school football player who many believed had a shot at the NFL, until his dreams were derailed when he was falsely accused of rape in 2002. Now, seven years after he was exonerated of a sexual assault allegation, Banks hopes the film detailing his fight for justice helps move along reform.

    • Long Beach, California
    • False Accusation of Rape
    • TBD

    Foreclosure Avial v Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Comenity Bank/ New York & Company, OCWEN et al California

    • United States District Court Southern District Sand Diego
    • 3:17-cv-01274
    • Foreclosrue 15:1681 Fari Credit Reporting Act, 890 Other Statutory Actions, Federal Question
    • Docket States: Judge Myron James Lorenz Judge Jill L. Burkhardt Docket entry No. 1 states these Judges Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major

    Divorce, Colbern C. Stuart III RIP FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986); 2. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18 U.S.C. § 1962); 3. FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. § 1125); 3. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. § 2201); 4. MOTION FOR HARASSMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER (18 U.S.C. § 1514(b))

    • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    • Case No. 3:13-cv-1944 CAB BLM Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo
    • Divorce, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986); 2. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18 U.S.C. § 1962); 3. FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. § 1125); 3. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. § 2201); 4. MOTION FOR HARASSMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER (18 U.S.C. § 1514(b))
    • Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo
    Donate with Paypal
    Go Fund Me
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    person
    Sign in
    personDon't have an account?
    lockForgot password?
    person
    Create an account

    IMPORTANT NOTICE: After registering your account, please check your email and click on the confirmation, then return to the website and log back in with the username and password you received in your email.

    PRIVACY POLICY: Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.

    Already Registered?

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link