California James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California

Date

June 11, 2020
City/County

County of Sutter, Yuba City, CA
Type of Case

Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud Ruled Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.

Title

Date

June 11, 2020

State or Country

California

County/City:

County of Sutter, Yuba City, CA

The Court the Case was filed in

Superior Court of California, County of Sutter

Type of Case

Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud Ruled Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.

Case Number

CVCS20-0912

Judges

Honorable Sarah H. Heckman Judge of the Superior Court
Judge Perry Parker,

Plaintiff

JAMES GALLAGHER et al.,

Defendant

GAVIN NEWSOM, as Governor, etc.,

Plaintiff Attorney

James Gallagher, in pro. per., and Kevin Kiley, in pro. per., for Real Parties in
Interest.

Defendant Attorney

Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson, Assistant Attorney
General, Benjamin M. Glickman, Jay C. Russell and John W. Killeen, Deputy Attorneys
General, for Petitioner.

Comments

Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.

Social Networks

Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

https://ad03.asmrc.org/sites/default/files/files-uploaded/TRO.pdf%20%20

No comments yet.

Add a comment

You May Also Be Interested In

Innocent Thursday, May 24, 2012 , Brian Kieth Banks weeps after his rape conviction was dismissed in court in Long Beach, Calif. Banks, 34, was a standout high school football player who many believed had a shot at the NFL, until his dreams were derailed when he was falsely accused of rape in 2002. Now, seven years after he was exonerated of a sexual assault allegation, Banks hopes the film detailing his fight for justice helps move along reform.

Long Beach, California
False Accusation of Rape
TBD

Foreclosure Avial v Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Comenity Bank/ New York & Company, OCWEN et al California

United States District Court Southern District Sand Diego
3:17-cv-01274
Foreclosrue 15:1681 Fari Credit Reporting Act, 890 Other Statutory Actions, Federal Question
Docket States: Judge Myron James Lorenz Judge Jill L. Burkhardt Docket entry No. 1 states these Judges Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major

Divorce, Colbern C. Stuart III RIP FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986); 2. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18 U.S.C. § 1962); 3. FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. § 1125); 3. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. § 2201); 4. MOTION FOR HARASSMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER (18 U.S.C. § 1514(b))

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 3:13-cv-1944 CAB BLM Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Divorce, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986); 2. RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT OF 1970 (18 U.S.C. § 1962); 3. FALSE ADVERTISING (15 U.S.C. § 1125); 3. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. § 2201); 4. MOTION FOR HARASSMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER (18 U.S.C. § 1514(b))
Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo

California James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California

Title

Date

State or Country

County/City:

The Court the Case was filed in

Type of Case

Case Number

Judges

Plaintiff

Defendant

Plaintiff Attorney

Defendant Attorney

Comments

Social Networks

Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

Add a comment

Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

You May Also Be Interested In

Foreclosure Avial v Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Comenity Bank/ New York & Company, OCWEN et al California