JudicialPedia Logo
    • Explore
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case

    Eric v Sudds Inmate 1212661 WRONGFUL CONVICTED 18 YEARS NOW

    • Date
      August 31, 2020
    • City/County
      Houston texas
    • Type of Case
      Criminal
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Eric v Sudds Inmate 1212661 WRONGFUL CONVICTED 18 YEARS NOW

    Date
    August 31, 2020
    State or Country
    United Kingdom
    County/City:
    Houston texas
    The Court the Case was filed in

    2002 can't remember all of it

    Type of Case
    Criminal
    Case Number

    0908470 + 0908469 I can't remember

    Judges

    Mary Lou keel Houston Texas Harris county

    Arbitrators

    Two Harris county women falsely accussed Eric v sudds 1212661

    Mediators

    Eric's lawyers Kurt Wentz and Anthony Mohammed From Houston Texas RAILROADED ERIC V SUDDS

    Plaintiff

    Eric v sudds was falsely accuseded by two women drug attics and they Fasley accused him

    Defendant

    Eric v sudds 1212661

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Kurt Wentz and Anthony Mohammed was court appointed lawyers they lied to Eric v sudds also I found out that in 2003 they dropped one of Eric's cases and he was never told I found this out from a records lady on the phone.and also a Houston Texas Sherriff told Eric v sudds also that one of his cases was Dropped can You all Please Help him

    Sherrif

    Harris county

    Police

    Harris county Houston texas

    Judges Comments

    Also When it was time for Eric v sudds to talk to the judge his lawyers told Eric he could not talk to judge Mary Lou keel Harris county

    Comments

    Eric was minulated by those Court appointed lawyers also they two Women were Dope ferns it's not right we tried to get help from The innonce Project they told ERIC V SUDDS they do not take none DNA cases.We also tried the Texas INNONCE network they lied Mrs Cassandra Lou she talk to me a couple of time she even gave us the two women's name who lied on him .I call her and ask her are they still gonna help Eric .Know she asked us if Eric has any new Evidence .I told Mrs Cassandra Lou of the Texas INNONCE network how is ERIC gonna have any new news I told her I THOUGHT they was suppose to DO IT FOR ERIC .THANK YOU SO MUCH TO

    Contact Info

    I have a lot of Eric's v sudds PAPER WORKSabout none DNA found from him and papers from Harris county to God bless.

  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    The Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle has won her high court privacy case against the Mail on Sunday, hailing her victory as a “comprehensive win” over the newspaper’s “illegal and dehumanising practices.”

    • London High Court, Chancery Division,
    • TBD
    • The former Meghan Markle, 39, is suing publisher Associated Newspapers for invasion of privacy and copyright infringement over five February 2019 articles in the Mail on Sunday and on the MailOnline website, which published portions of a handwritten letter to her father, Thomas Markle, after her 2018 wedding to Harry
    • Lord Justice Warby In his judgment, ruled for Meghan Markle’s in her claim for misuse of private information against Associated Newspapers, publishers of the Mail on Sunday (MoS) and Mail Online, over five articles in February 2019 that included extracts from the letter.

    Julian Assange - Is the USA trying to poison him?

    • United Kingdom
    • TBD
    • Hacking? Or Civil Rights
    • TBD
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link