JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    TERRY MCAULIFFE; ANTHONY RODHAM XIAOLIN “CHARLES” WANG Must be nice to have the POWER & MONEY TO SCAM with EB 5's Lawsuit charges Va. Governor Terry McAuliffe with fraud over struggling electric car venture Verified listing

    • Date
      July 17, 2019
    • City/County
      Alexandria, Virginia
    • Type of Case
      Theft by EB 5's by Defendants of Chinese Nationalists
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    TERRY MCAULIFFE; ANTHONY RODHAM XIAOLIN “CHARLES” WANG Must be nice to have the POWER & MONEY TO SCAM with EB 5's Lawsuit charges Va. Governor Terry McAuliffe with fraud over struggling electric car venture

    Case Number

    No. 18-2194 United States of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01459-CMH-IDD)

    State or Country
    Virginia
    Judges

    Judge Claude M. Hilton a Judge that most state he has no integrety Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01459-CMH-IDD)

    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Wilkinson wrote the opinion, in which Judge
    Niemeyer and Senior Judge Duncan joined. - All Federal Judges for Sale

    Defendant

    TERRY MCAULIFFE; ANTHONY RODHAM

    XIAOLIN “CHARLES” WANG; DOES 1-100,

    Plaintiff Attorney

    ARGUED: Gerard Patrick Fox, Marina Vladimir Bogorad, GERARD FOX LAW P.C.,
    Los Angeles, California, for Appellants. Marc Erik Elias, PERKINS COIE LLP,
    Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Scott M. Abeles, GERARD FOX LAW
    P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Bruce V. Spiva, Amanda R. Callais, PERKINS
    COIE LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

    Intervener

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 26, 2018, GreenTech Automotive, Inc., Gulf
    Coast Funds Management, LLC, American Immigration Center, LLC, GreenTech Automotive
    Capital A-3 GP, LLC, and WM Industries Corp. (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary
    petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in the United
    States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, under the following case numbers:

    • GreenTech Automotive, Inc. - Case number 18-10651;
    • Gulf Coast Funds Management, LLC – Case number 18-10653;
    • American Immigration Center, LLC – Case number 18-10654;
    • GreenTech Automotive Capital A-3 GP, LLC – Case number 18-10655; and
    • WM Industries Corp. – Case number 18-10652.

    Pursuant to Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of a bankruptcy matter
    operates as a stay to the commencement or continuation of any judicial proceeding. This action
    is founded on claims that should all be stayed given the filing of the Petitions because the claims
    asserted against the non-debtor defendants herein are interrelated with the claims asserted against
    the Debtors. This Suggestion of Bankruptcy is for informational purposes only.

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Website
    • Other
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.scribd.com/document/191413373/GreenTech-Automotive-A-Venture-Capitalized-by-Cronyism

    Document Link 2

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/suit-charges-va-governor-with-fraud-over-struggling-electric-car-venture/2017/11/29/0ff46ef0-d529-11e7-95bf-df7c19270879_story.html

    Document Link 3

    https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/182194.P.pdf%20%20%20Appeal%20by%20Judges%20Bias

    Document Link 4

    https://causeofaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/52-2018.02.27-Suggest-of-Bankruptcy.pdf

    Date
    July 17, 2019
    Type of Case
    Theft by EB 5's by Defendants of Chinese Nationalists
    The Court the Case was filed in

    USDC of the Eastern Division of Virginia (Alexandria)

    County/City:
    Alexandria, Virginia
    Plaintiff

    XIA BI; NIAN CHEN; YING CHENG; CHUNGSHENG LI; LIN LIN; LAN LIU;
    MEIMING SHEN; YUNPING TAN; BIXIANG TANG; YAHONG WANG; YUE
    WANG; JIAN WU; JUNPING YAO; XUEMEI ZHANG; YAN ZHAO,
    Plaintiffs – Appellants,
    and
    YUANYUAN CHEN; JUN HUANG; KUI LE; ZHONGHUI LI; CHUN WANG;
    RUI WANG; LEI YAN; JIN YOU; ZHEN YU; HOUQIAN YU; NIANQING
    ZHANG; HUIBIN ZHAO,
    Plaintiffs,

    Defendant Attorney

    ARGUED: Gerard Patrick Fox, Marina Vladimir Bogorad, GERARD FOX LAW P.C.,
    Los Angeles, California, for Appellants. Marc Erik Elias, PERKINS COIE LLP,
    Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Scott M. Abeles, GERARD FOX LAW
    P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Bruce V. Spiva, Amanda R. Callais, PERKINS
    COIE LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

    Comments

    Money for nothing: Sweet Appomattox deal turned sour for Virginia, McAuliffe
    Jeff Sturgeon Jan 16, 2016 -https://roanoke.com/business/money-for-nothing-sweet-appomattox-deal-turned-sour-for-virginia-mcauliffe/article_4e5c1198-2e73-513b-becd-5848edb5e3e9.html

    Virginia and its Governor’s Opportunity Fund bet $1.4 million on a failed business deal near Lynchburg that exposed the state’s weak control over industrial incentives and the application process for companies seeking grant money.

    An investigation by The Roanoke Times found:

    State analysts relied on a company website produced in China featuring misleading information, including the listing of a North Carolina address where the company never was located and production photographs and text lifted from an unaffiliated American company.
    Text similar to material on the website appeared in a pre-approval request to the state commerce secretary and a briefing for the governor before his meeting in Beijing with a project principal.
    Officials also relied on a site consultant who vouched for the company but hadn’t asked basic background questions, such as the company’s address in China, until shortly before the deal was closed.
    Approached by the same players in 2013, North Carolina officials made checks and asked questions that Virginia officials did not.
    Only after the project appeared to stall did Virginia officials ask for company financial statements.

    Ultimately, the deal fell apart and Virginia demanded the return of taxpayer money granted for the project.

    After learning from a reporter about state officials’ reliance on the false website material, Secretary of Commerce and Trade Maurice Jones said he ordered reforms to Virginia’s vetting protocol as a result of the lapses in the evaluation of Lindenburg Industry LLC.

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    JUDGES CAN BE SUED & DOJ SUES Maryland FEDERAL JUDGES Verified listing

    • U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore)
    • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:25-cv-02029-TTC
    • CRIMINAL
    • Judge Thomas T Cullen

    PETITION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIGH CRIMES,N MISDEMEANORS, AND OTHER SERIOUS BREACHES OF PUBLIC TRUST Verified listing

    • Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • TBD
    • Impeachment of Justice Roberts
    • TBD
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link