JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    USA v Kenneth Joseph Owen Thomas J6 Verified listing

    • Date
      January 6, 2021
    • City/County
      Washington DC
    • Type of Case
      January 6, 2023 Freedom of Speech - Constitutional Rights
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    USA v Kenneth Joseph Owen Thomas J6

    Case Number

    1:21-cr-00552

    State or Country
    District of Columbia
    Judges

    Judge Dabney Langhorne Friedrich

    Defendant

    KENNETH JOSEPH OWEN THOMAS

    Guilty Unless Proven Innocent
    Over 1000 Americans have been arrested by the FBI for being at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021. They're being held without trial in federal prisons all across our country. The horror stories of them being beaten, tortured, & malnourished are gut wrenching. They are denied religious services. They are denied meetings with their attorneys. They are held in solitary confinement unsanitary conditions for months on end. They are denied medical services, basic hygiene & clean water. They suffer through retaliation, discrimination & malicious intents to harm them. Despite all this, these Patriots, who carry the burden as Jan 6 political hostages, find the resolve to raise their voices as one to sing our beloved National Anthem in protest to their illegal incarceration & inhumane conditions. This has inspired an entire nation to stand behind them & join in singing with them. Stand in solidarity with us to strengthen their spirits & bring awareness to their cause with one voice, one song, under God, until they see true & fair justice.

    Plaintiff Attorney

    USA
    REPRESENTED BY

    Jennifer M Rozzoni
    (505) 224-1460
    DOJ-USAO, Lrm Lee, Edmund
    201 3rd St. Nw, P.O. Box 607
    Albuquerque, NM 87103
    TERMINATED: 02/07/2023 (Feb. 7, 2023)

    Samantha Ritvo Miller
    (202) 252-7014
    USAO, USAO Ddc
    601 D St. NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
    LEAD ATTORNEY
    New York Bar No. 5342175
    Samantha.Miller@usdoj.gov

    Sean Patrick McCauley
    (202) 252-1897
    Sean Patrick McCauley
    601 D St. NW
    Usa
    Washington, DC 20001
    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
    LEAD ATTORNEY
    Sean.McCauley@usdoj.gov

    Matthew M. Graves
    United States Attorney
    DC Bar No. 481052

    Intervener

    Certified ADA Advocate Janice Wolk Grenadier

    Others that affected your case

    Everyone in the United States who believes that all courts should treat citizens fairly.

    Judges Comments

    Judge ignored
    1. First Amendment of the Untited States Constitution
    2. The Fithe and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution the right to Due Proceess
    3. Brady violations by the USA Attorneys: Jennifer M. Rozzoni, Samantha Ritvo Miller and Sean Patrick McCauley and others
    4. Jenks violations by the USA Attorneys: Jennifer M. Rozzoni, Samantha Ritvo Miller and Sean Patrick McCauley and others
    5. It not appear the FBI agent that testified was truthful to Janice Wolk Greanadier - ADA Advocate

    Social Networks
    • Website
    • Other
    • Other
    • Website
    • Other
    • Website
    • Website
    • Website
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60364171/united-states-v-thomas/

    Document Link 2

    https://www.scribd.com/document/646982051/MOTION-to-Dismiss-Case-for-Brady-and-Jencks-Violations-by-DEFENDANT-KENNETH-JOSEPH-THOMAS

    Document Link 3

    https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/case-multi-defendant/file/1398806/download

    Date
    January 6, 2021
    Type of Case
    January 6, 2023 Freedom of Speech - Constitutional Rights
    The Court the Case was filed in

    United States District Court of the District of Columbia

    County/City:
    Washington DC
    Plaintiff

    United States

    Defendant Attorney

    KENNETH JOSEPH OWEN THOMAS
    REPRESENTED BY

    John M. Pierce
    (213) 400-0725
    John Pierce Law P.C.
    21550 Oxnard St.
    Suite 3rd Floor OMB # 172
    Woodland Hills, CA 91367

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    LEAD ATTORNEY

    Joseph R. Conte
    (202) 236-1147
    Joseph R. Conte
    8251 NW 15th Court
    Coral Springs, FL 33071

    TERMINATED: 12/16/2022 (Dec. 16, 2022)

    Roger Roots
    (775) 764-9347
    Roger Roots
    10 Dorrance St.
    Suite 700 # 649
    Providence, RI 02903

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    LEAD ATTORNEY

    Police

    The Defense lawyers and FBI withheld secret, undisclosed 302s

    Ainsworth
    Officer Anthony Campanale
    MPD Officer Robert redacted due to his claim of PTSD

    Comments

    A must to read: DEFENDANT's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT BRADY and JENKS VIOLATIONS

    https://www.scribd.com/document/646982051/MOTION-to-Dismiss-Case-for-Brady-and-Jencks-Violations-by-DEFENDANT-KENNETH-JOSEPH-THOMAS

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ::v. : Criminal Case No.:KENNETH JOSEPH OWEN THOMAS, : 1:21-cr-00552 (CRC):Defendant ::___________________________________________

    DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANTBRADY AND JENKS VIOLATIONS

    Defendant KENNETH JOSEPH OWEN THOMAS (“Thomas”), through the undersignedcounsel, John L. Pierce, Esq. and Roger I. Roots, esq., hereby moves to dismiss this case, withprejudice, based on numerous significant and material Brady and Jenks violations. These violations are so outrageous and egregious that they justify the most severe sanctions available tothe Court, including dismissal of this case with prejudice. Thomas also demands that thetestimony of trial witnesses Ainsworth, Campanale, and *****1 be stricken due to theseviolations. Thomas also suggests that these officers’ supervisors be informed of these officers’testimony at trial. (Note that counsel will file exhibits separately, redacted.)

    As the Court has been made aware, the prosecution in this case provided, by email,several previously-undisclosed FBI 302 reports on the night of May 17, 2023, at 7:43 PM. This was after most significant prosecution witnesses had already finished testifying. Please go to the link and read more

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    JUDGES CAN BE SUED & DOJ SUES Maryland FEDERAL JUDGES Verified listing

    • U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore)
    • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:25-cv-02029-TTC
    • CRIMINAL
    • Judge Thomas T Cullen

    PETITION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIGH CRIMES,N MISDEMEANORS, AND OTHER SERIOUS BREACHES OF PUBLIC TRUST Verified listing

    • Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • TBD
    • Impeachment of Justice Roberts
    • TBD
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link