Title
VIRGINIA ETHICS COMPLAINT FILED IN LOUISA CIRCUIT COURT AGAINST CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS AND KAREN GOULD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR, et al.
VIRGINIA ETHICS COMPLAINT FILED IN LOUISA CIRCUIT COURT AGAINST CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS AND KAREN GOULD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR, et al.
CL 21-209 - Louisa, Virginia Circuit Court
Defendants:
Chief Justice Donald W. Lemons, in his official capacity
John F. Daffron, Jr. - Suffolk and Chesterfield Circuit Courts
H. Thomas Padrick, Jr. - Virginia Beach and Suffolk Circuit Courts
Karen Gould, Director of the Virginia State Bar, in her official capacity,
&
Donald W. Lemons, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, in his official capacity
&
VSB Disciplinary prosecutors, attorneys in private practice, two judges and a Circuit Court Clerk
THE PUBLIC:
Complainants filing Ethics Violation Complaints with the Virginia State Bar.
Respondent attorneys, who are prosecuted and tried by the Virginia State Bar and the Circuit Court Three-Judge Panels.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2erb2yslzk68ya2/6-10-21%20COMPLT-EXHS-LTR%20CLK.pdf?dl=0
Circuit Court for the County of Louisa, Virginia
Rhetta M. Daniel
Comments
Anyone has the right to file an Ethics Complaint in a court in Virginia against lawyers practicing law in Virginia and all Virginia judges and justices because they must be licensed lawyers.
Since 1976, the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Virginia State Bar have been violating Virginia Code
§ 54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article, the Supreme Court shall not promulgate rules or regulations prescribing a code of ethics governing the professional conduct of attorneys which are inconsistent with any statute; nor shall it promulgate any rule or regulation or method of procedure which eliminates the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with the discipline of attorneys. In no case shall an attorney who demands to be tried by a court of competent jurisdiction for the violation of any rule or regulation adopted under this article be tried in any other manner. Code 1950, § 54-51; 1974, c. 536; 1988, c. 765.