JudicialPedia Logo
    • Explore
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case

    Arizona Aguilera v. Fontes et al

    • Date
      November 9, 2020
    • City/County
      Maricopa
    • Type of Case
      Voter Fraud
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Arizona Aguilera v. Fontes et al

    Date
    November 9, 2020
    State or Country
    Arizona
    County/City:
    Maricopa
    The Court the Case was filed in

    SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY

    Type of Case
    Voter Fraud
    Case Number

    CV2020-014083

    Judges

    HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY

    COURT ADMIN-CIVIL-ARB DESK
    DOCKET-CIVIL-CCC
    JUDGE KILEY
    JUDGE MAHONEY

    Plaintiff

    LAURIE AGUILERA, et al

    Defendant

    ADRIAN FONTES, et al.

    Plaintiff Attorney

    ALEXANDER M KOLODIN

    Defendant Attorney

    JOSEPH EUGENE LA RUE
    SARAH R GONSKI
    BRETT W JOHNSON
    ROY HERRERA
    THOMAS J. BASILE
    ROOPALI HARDIN DESAI

    Clerk of Court

    K. Ballard Deputy

    Judges Comments

    When Intervenors filed their Motions to Intervene under Rule 24 on 11/5/2020, they
    complied with the Rule 24(c)(1)(B) requirement that “[a]nyone moving to intervene must … attach
    as an exhibit to the motion a copy of the proposed pleading in intervention that sets out the claim
    or defense for which intervention is sought.” However, Rule 24(c)(2), entitled Filing and Serving
    Pleading in Intervention, directs: “Unless the court orders otherwise, an intervenor must file and
    serve the pleading in intervention within 10 days after entry of the order granting the motion to
    intervene.”

    This Court ordered granting the two unopposed Motions to Intervene on the record during
    the Order to Show Cause Return Hearing held on 11/5/2020. However, as of today, 11/9/2020, the
    docket does not reflect any Answer in Intervention, or any other Answer, or any Motion for
    Summary Judgment, yet having been filed in this cause. Consequently, THE COURT FINDS
    Plaintiffs had the right to file their Notice of Voluntary Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on
    11/7/2020, resulting in dismissal of this cause without need for further Order of the Court.

    This cause thus having been dismissed by operation of law upon the filing of Plaintiffs’
    Notice of Dismissal on 11/7/2020, IT IS ORDERED denying the Secretary’s Motion to Transfer
    and Consolidate Related Cases as this cause was dismissed before the Motion was filed.

    Comments

    Combined with Case No. CV 2020-014248

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Other
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Website
    • Website
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Illegal Guardianship FREEDOM DENIED for Combat Veteran Sioux Indian

    • Lower Sioux tribal court
    • Illegal Guardianship
    • Jessica Ryan/Kramer Doing this for her family who sued Cal and didn't receive the property.

    Arizona Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes

    • Superior Court of Arizona Maricopa County
    • CV2020-014553
    • Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud
    • HONORABLE JOHN R. HANNAH JR

    Arizona Arizona Democratic Party v. Katie Hobbs / COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF

    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
    • 2:20-cv-01143-DLR (D. Ariz.) 20-16759; 20-16766 (9th Cir.)
    • Voter Fraud, Voter Integrity
    • U.S. District Judge Douglas Rayes
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link