JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    California James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California Verified listing

    • Date
      June 11, 2020
    • City/County
      County of Sutter, Yuba City, CA
    • Type of Case
      Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud Ruled Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    California James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California

    Case Number

    CVCS20-0912

    State or Country
    California
    Judges

    Honorable Sarah H. Heckman Judge of the Superior Court
    Judge Perry Parker,

    Defendant

    GAVIN NEWSOM, as Governor, etc.,

    Plaintiff Attorney

    James Gallagher, in pro. per., and Kevin Kiley, in pro. per., for Real Parties in
    Interest.

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://ad03.asmrc.org/sites/default/files/files-uploaded/TRO.pdf%20%20

    Date
    June 11, 2020
    Type of Case
    Voter Integrity, Voter Fraud Ruled Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.
    The Court the Case was filed in

    Superior Court of California, County of Sutter

    County/City:
    County of Sutter, Yuba City, CA
    Plaintiff

    JAMES GALLAGHER et al.,

    Defendant Attorney

    Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson, Assistant Attorney
    General, Benjamin M. Glickman, Jay C. Russell and John W. Killeen, Deputy Attorneys
    General, for Petitioner.

    Comments

    Challenging Executive Order N-67-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 3, 2020. The court found Order N-67-20 to be unconstitutional and enjoining Newsom from "amend[ing], alter[ing], or chang[ing] existing statutory law or mak[ing] new statutory or legislative policy" via the California Emergency Services Act.

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    JUDGES CAN BE SUED & DOJ SUES Maryland FEDERAL JUDGES Verified listing

    • U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore)
    • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:25-cv-02029-TTC
    • CRIMINAL
    • Judge Thomas T Cullen

    PETITION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIGH CRIMES,N MISDEMEANORS, AND OTHER SERIOUS BREACHES OF PUBLIC TRUST Verified listing

    • Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • TBD
    • Impeachment of Justice Roberts
    • TBD
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link