Title
Isidoro Rodriguez v. General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al., Fairfax Cir. Ct. CL-20-0016227, 11/14/198
Isidoro Rodriguez v. General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al., Fairfax Cir. Ct. CL-20-0016227, 11/14/198
Fairfax Cir. Ct. CL-20-0016227, 11/14/198
Circuit Judge Kelsey
General Assembly oif Virigia, Govenor of Virginia, Supreme Court of Virignia, Virginia State Bar, and Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board
Isidoro Rodriguez
LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY RELATED PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS WHICH HAVE SYSTEMICALLY DENIED ACCESS TO AN IMPARTIAL COURT TO RECIPROCALLY ENFORCE THE VSBDB VOID AD INITIO ORDER.
1. Isidoro Rodriguez v. General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., S. Ct. VA No. 190579 (September 2, 2019); Fairfax County Circuit Court Case No. 2018-16227 (February 12, 2019).
2. Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., US Dist. Ct. ED VA 12-cv-663-JAB (April 12, 2013), aff’d 4th Cir USCA No 13-1638 (Nov. 2013), cert. denied 2014.
3. In the matter of Isidoro Rodriguez, US Sup. Ct. Docket No. D-02466 (May 26, 2010), cert. denied.
4. Isidoro and Irene Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, US Tax Court Docket No. 10691-09, cert. denied; and, Isidoro Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, US Tax Court Docket No. 11855-12, cert. denied 2014.
5. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Jack Harbeston, and Eric Holder et al., US Dist. Ct. WD Wash. No. 11-cv-1601 (JCC).
6. Irene Rodriguez and Isidoro Rodriguez v. Douglas Shulman, et al., D.C. Cir. Ct. No. 11-cv-1183(JEB).
7. In re Isidoro Rodriguez, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, ML No. 2307 (December 14, 2011).
8. Isidoro Rodriguez v. US Tax Court, D.C. Cir. No. 10-1016, cert. denied, US Sup. Ct. No. 10-1066 (Closed, March 21, 2011).
9. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Virginia Employment Commission, US Sup Ct. Docket No. 09-954 (Cert. Denied March 19, 2010), S. Ct. VA Record No. 092494, and the Court of Appeals of Virginia, Record No. 0291-09-4.
10. Isidoro Rodriguez v. US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, (D.C. Cir. No. 08-7134) cert. denied No. 09-237 (November 2, 2009).
11. In the matter of Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., (4th Cir. No. 06-9518), cert. denied No. 08-942 (March 20, 2009), injunction denied (March 24, 2009).
12. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Standing Committee on Attorney Discipline, (3rd Cir. No 08-8037), cert. denied No. 08-1121 (Closed, May 18, 2009).
13. Isidoro Rodriguez v. US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, (2nd Cir. No 08-90089); cert. denied No. 08-942 (Closed, July 31, 2009).
14. Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq. v. Editor-in-Chief, Legal Times, et al., DC Dist. Ct. No 07-cv-0975 (PF), DC Ct App. N. 07-5334, injunction denied SC Ct. No. 07A601, cert. denied US Sup Ct. 08-411(Closed, 2008).
15. In re Isidoro Rodriguez, U.S. Dist. Ct. for the E. D. VA, Docket No. 1:08-mc-00022, May 28, 2008.
16. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al., (S. Ct. No. 07-419, November 2, 2007); and Isidoro Rodriguez v. Supreme Court of Virginia, (Va. Sup. Ct No. 07-0283), cert denied Nos. 07-A142 and 07A370 (2007).
17. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Devis and VA State Bar, VA Sup Ct. No. 06052, cert. denied US Sup Ct. Nos. 06A619/06-875 (Closed, October 2006).
18. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Pereira, 163 F. Appx. 227 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 954 (2006).
19. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Guy Vander Jagt, et al., Sup. Ct. of Va. No 040941/040942, cert. denied, No. 04-867 (Feb. 28, 2005).
20. Isidoro Rodriguez v. HFP Inc., et al., 77 F. Appx. 663 (4th Cir. 2003), cert. denied 541 U.S. 903 (2004).
21. Isidoro Rodriguez-Hazbun v. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children et al, D.C. No. 03-120(RWR); D.C. Cir. No. 03-5092, cert. denied USSC No. 03-301 (2006).
https://isidororodriguez.com/2019/05/06/in-the-supreme-court-of-virginia-petition-for-appeal-record-no-isidoro-rodriguez-plaintiff-petitioner-pro-per-v-the-general-assembly-of-virginia-the-office-of-the-governor-of-virginia-the/
Isidoro Rodriguez
2671 Avenir Place, Apt 2227
Vienna, Virginia 22180
Telephone: 571.477.5350
Fairfax Cir. Ct. CL-20-0016227, 11/14/198
Isidoro Rodriguez
Ms. Erin R. McNeill, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General for the
Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board
The Office of the Attorney General
202 North 9th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Comments
I request the filing of an amicus curie Statement of Interest under 28 U.S.C. § 517 (2014), in support of my Petition for Appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia in Isidoro Rodriguez v. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia (Ex. A), and in support of my Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition in Isidoro Rodriguez v. Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, the Fairfax County Circuit Court Docket No. 2018-16433 (Ex B) (See http://www.isidororodriguez.com). This request under 28 U.S.C. § 517 (2014), and the above civil suits relate directly to both of your current investigation into the Washington D.C./Virginia Oligarchy of government attorneys acts outside of authority and their claim of “impunity” for violation of the mandate of separation of power, as well as checks and balances.
Therefore the request for the filing of an amicus curie Statement of Interest is based upon the Federal interest to “guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,” under Article Four, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution, and to secure a common law trial by jury or empanel a Special Grand Jury to investigate the evidence of illegal acts, and to ensure that “justice is applied fairly” (Emphasis added, Martin v. City of Boise, No. 09-cv-540-REB (D. Idaho Sept. 28, 2015), ECF No. 276, 2015 WL 5708586. Statement of Interest at 5 note 23)
The evidence and admissions in the Virginia actions confirm that Federal and Virginia government attorneys, employees, and judges have acted outside the scope of employment, outside the sphere of legitimate legislative activity by enacting ex post facto legislation, and outside of judicial authority to “conform” VA Code surreally to illegal Court Rules that established retroactively a centralized illegal “parallel” attorney disciplinary system under the court’s control in violation of the Common Law, the Constitution of Virginia and VA Code. Thus these official have “[resisted] the execution of the laws under color of authority” by a Class 2 felony VA Code§§ 18.2 481 & 482 and undertook a business conspiracy in violation of VA Code and Federal statute (See Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., U.S. Dist. Ct. E.D. VA 12 cv 663 JAB (April 12, 2013), aff’d 4th Cir USCA No 13-1638 (Nov. 2013); See also Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq. v. Editor-in-Chief, Legal Times, Washington Post, et al., DC Dist. Ct. No 07-cv-0975 (PF), DC Ct App. N. 07-5334, injunction denied SC Ct No. 07A601, cert. denied US Sup Ct 08-411(Closed, 2008).
Thus, this Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 517 (2014), is appropriate to secure the right of the citizens of Virginia of access to an impartial common law jury trial, Special Grand Jury to investigate Federal and Virginia government attorneys, employees and judges willful violations of the limitation and prohibition of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, VA Code, and the Void Ab Initio Order Doctrine during the administrations of Democrat Governors Mark Warner, Democrat Tim Kaine, “Establishment” Republican Attorney General Kenneth Thomas Cuccinelli II, Democrat Terry McAuliffe, and Democrat Ralph Northam.