JudicialPedia Logo
    • Explore
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case

    Jill Stein et al v Pedro A. Cortes et al - Jill wins recount for Green Party in PA for 2016 Election

    • Date
      November 30, 2016
    • City/County
      Philadelphia
    • Type of Case
      Voter Fraud, Voter Integrity: Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act Nature of Suit: 441 Civil Rights: Voting The Pennsylvania election system is a national disgrace. Voters are forced to use vulnerable, hackable, antiquated technology banned in other states, essentially relying on the kindness of machines. That kindness is misplaced. At least some of the plaintiffs’ votes were almost certainly not counted in the 2016 election. They were disenfranchised.
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Jill Stein et al v Pedro A. Cortes et al - Jill wins recount for Green Party in PA for 2016 Election

    Date
    November 30, 2016
    State or Country
    Pennsylvania
    County/City:
    Philadelphia
    The Court the Case was filed in

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

    Type of Case
    Voter Fraud, Voter Integrity: Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act Nature of Suit: 441 Civil Rights: Voting The Pennsylvania election system is a national disgrace. Voters are forced to use vulnerable, hackable, antiquated technology banned in other states, essentially relying on the kindness of machines. That kindness is misplaced. At least some of the plaintiffs’ votes were almost certainly not counted in the 2016 election. They were disenfranchised.
    Case Number

    2:16-cv-06287-PD Jury Demand

    Judges

    HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND

    Plaintiff

    JILL STEIN, RANDALL REITZ, ROBIN HOWE,
    SHANNON KNIGHT, EMILY COOK, and
    KIMBERLY KUPKA,

    Defendant

    PEDRO A. CORTÉS, in his official capacity as
    Secretary of the Commonwealth; and JONATHAN
    MARKS, in his official capacity as Commissioner
    of the Bureau of Commissions, Elections, and
    Legislation,

    Intervener

    Intervene filed by ALL OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ELECTORS OF
    PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP AND VICE-PRESIDENT-ELECT
    MICHAEL PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.,
    PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF
    PENNSYLVANIA, VICE-PRESIDENT-ELECT MICHAEL PENCE.Memorandum,

    Trump et al Attorneys: Lawrence J. Tabas, I.D. No. 27815
    Rebecca L. Warren, I.D. No. 63669
    OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL
    & HIPPEL LLP
    Centre Square West
    1500 Market Street, Suite 3400
    Philadelphia, PA 19102
    (215) 665-3158
    Chad Readler*
    JONES DAY
    325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Ste.
    600
    Columbus, OH 43215
    (614) 469-3939
    David Morrell*
    JONES DAY
    51 Louisiana Ave. NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    (202) 879-3939
    *Admitted pro hac vice

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Gregory M. Harvey
    PA Attorney ID 4445
    Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP
    123 South Broad Street
    Philadelphia, PA 19109
    Phone: 215-772-7684
    Fax:215-772-7620
    wT.com
    Ilann M. *
    Andrew G. Celli, Jr.*
    Alison E. Frick*
    Douglas E. Liebt
    Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP
    600 Fifth Avenue, 1Oth Floor
    New York, NY 10020
    Phone: 212-763-5000
    Fax:212-763-5001
    Email : imaazel@ecbalaw. com
    * Admitted pro hac vice

    Comments

    INTRODUCTION
    1. The Pennsylvania election system is a national disgrace. Voters are forced to use
    vulnerable, hackable, antiquated technology banned in other states, essentially relying on the
    kindness of machines. That kindness is misplaced. At least some of the plaintiffs’ votes were
    almost certainly not counted in the 2016 election. They were disenfranchised.
    2. Compounding the problem, there is no paper trail in the majority of Pennsylvania
    election districts. Voting machines are electoral black sites: No one permits voters or candidates
    to examine them.
    3. After election day, voters are equally helpless to make sure their votes are
    counted. The Election Code requires 27,474 voters in 9,158 districts to bring notarized petitions
    to county boards, in time for shifting, divergent, and secret deadlines known to no one except,
    perhaps, 67 separate county election boards. In court recounts, voters must pay exorbitant fees,
    and (according to boards of elections) should only one voter fail to sign a single petition in a
    single district anywhere in the State, no one can seek a recount anywhere.
    4. This labyrinthine, incomprehensible, and impossibly burdensome election regime
    might make Kafka proud. But for ordinary voters, it is a disaster.
    5. These arbitrary, unreasonable rules place an impossible burden on the right to
    vote, the right to have one’s vote counted, and the right to pursue recounts in Pennsylvania. As a
    result, Defendants have violated the United States Constitution.

    Read More: https://ecbawm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Stein.-Amended-Complaint.pdf

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Twitter
    • Twitter
    • Website
    • Website
    • Website
    • Twitter
    • Website
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://ecbawm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Stein.-Amended-Complaint.pdf

    Document Link 2

    http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7133/file-8370.pdf?cb=83a91b

    Document Link 3

    https://timinhonolulu.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/20161206-pa-recount-docket.pdf

    Document Link 4

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.95.1.pdf

  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Civil Suit, Federal Court

    • Federal Court, Civil Suit
    • 1:19-CV-00243
    • Civil
    • Judge Richard Lanzillo, Magistrate

    Eugenia Grivas

    • Orphans Court in Lancaster County
    • 311 1/2 of 1999
    • Abusive Guardianship and estate
    • Corrupt judge Jay Hoberg and Cullen

    1443 WDA 2015

    • Erie
    • 1443 WDA 2015
    • Child Support
    • BOWES, STABILE AND MUSMANNO, JJ
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link