JudicialPedia Logo
    • Explore
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case

    Laywers Committee For 9/11 Inquiry vs. FBI and the United States Department of Justice

    • Date
      July 16, 2021
    • City/County
      District of Columbia Washington D.C.
    • Type of Case
      Criminal fraud and international crimes against humanity
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Laywers Committee For 9/11 Inquiry vs. FBI and the United States Department of Justice

    Date
    July 16, 2021
    State or Country
    District of Columbia
    County/City:
    District of Columbia Washington D.C.
    The Court the Case was filed in

    United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

    Type of Case
    Criminal fraud and international crimes against humanity
    Judges

    Merrick Garland

    Plaintiff

    The Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry Inc., Robert McILvaine and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

    Defendant

    Christopher A. Wray, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation, Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States and the Department of Justice of the United States

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Mick G. Harrison, Esq. 520 S. Walnut Street, #1147
    Bloomington, IN 47402

    Defendant Attorney

    John M. Clifford, Clifford & Garde, LLP
    815 Black Lives Matter Plaza, NW, #4082
    Washington, D.C. 20006
    Tel. 202.280.6115
    jclifford@cliffordgarde.com
    Counsel of Record

    Solicitor General of the United States
    Room 5616
    Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
    Washington, DC 20530-0001

    DANIEL TENNY
    JOSHUA DOS SANTOS
    Attorneys, Appellate Staff
    Civil Division, Room 7243
    U.S. Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
    Washington, DC 20530
    (202) 353-0213
    Joshua.Y.Dos.Santos@usdoj.gov
    Daniel.Tenny@usdoj.gov
    Attorneys for the Federal Defendants-Appellees

    Comments

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED

    Did the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Depart from the Accepted and Usual Course of Judicial Proceedings to Such
    an Extent as to Call for an Exercise of this Court's Supervisory Power When
    the Court of Appeals Failed to Provide a Remedy or a Disclosure Regarding
    an Apparent Violation of the Federal Judicial Disqualification Statute
    Regarding a Judge Who Was a Member of an Appeals Panel in a Case
    where the Department of Justice was a Defendant While that Judge Was a
    Candidate Under Consideration for the Nomination to be Attorney General
    of the United States?

    Did the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Err in Deciding the Proper Role of Legislative History in Determining
    Congressional Intent in a Manner that Conflicts with Decisions of the
    Supreme Court on this Important Question When the District Court
    Concluded that an Appropriations Act, which Provided Substantial Funding
    for the FBI to Conduct an Independent Assessment of Evidence Related to
    the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, Did Not Require the FBI to
    Report or Disclose Any Information Resulting from this Assessment to
    Anyone, Including to Congress, Notwithstanding Unambiguous and
    Authoritative Legislative History to the Contrary?

    Did the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Err in Interpreting the Requirements for Article III Standing in a Manner
    that Is in Conflict with Decisions of the Supreme Court on this Important
    Question When It Denied Standing to a Father Who Lost His Son in the 9/11
    Attacks, and to Two Non-Profit Organizations Asserting Informational and
    Organizational Standing, the Missions of which Are Focused on 9/11
    Transparency and Government Accountability?

    LIST OF PARTIES
    Petitioners, who were Plaintiffs-Appellants below, are:
    Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.; Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and
    Robert McILvaine.

    The Defendants-Appellees are Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal
    Bureau of Investigation, Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States,
    and the United States Department of Justice.

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/0001-Lawyers-Committee-Supreme-Court-Petition-for-Cert-with-Appendix.pdf

    Document Link 2

    https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca2/21-1338

    Document Link 3

    https://judicialmisconduct.us/sites/default/files/2019-09/LC911Inq%3DExecSummary.pdf

    Document Link 4

    https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caDC-20-05051

    Document Link 5

    https://www.law360.com/cases/5d7907060ccc1907dfb263f5

  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Zachary Jordan Alam - Freedom Fighter

    • U.S. District of Court of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) The Civil Rights Court of the United States of America
    • Case 1:21-cr-00190-DLF
    • Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, charged: 18 U.S.C. §§ 11 l(a) and (b) - Assault on a Federal Officer with a Dangerous or Deadly Weapon 18 U.S.C. § 1361 - Destmction ofGovemment Property over $1 ,000 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)- Obstmction ofan Official Proceeding 18 U.S.C. §§ l 752(a) and (b) - Unlawful Entty on Restricted Building or Grounds 40 U.S.C. §§ 5104(e)(2)(D), (F) and (G) - Violent Entty and Disorderly Conduct
    • Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

    Howard Betton Adams - Freedom Fighter

    • U.S. District of Court of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) The Civil Rights Court of the United States of America
    • Case 1:21-cr-00358-EGS
    • Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3) - Obstrnction ofLaw Enforcement During Civil Disorder, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) - Obsttuction ofJustice/Congress, 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(l) - Knowingly Entering or Remaining in any Restiicted Building or Grounds Without Lawful Authority, 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2) - Disorderly conduct in restricted building or grounds, 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) - Disorderly Conduct on Capitol Grounds, 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G) - parading or demonstrating in Capitol building. This criminal complaint is based on these facts:
    • Judge Emmet G. Sullivan G. Michael Harvey, U.S. Magistrate Judge

    Daniel Page Adams - Freedom Fighter

    • U.S. District of Court of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) The Civil Rights Court of the United States of America
    • CRIMINAL NO. 2T-CR.O84-OI. 02 PLF
    • Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, J6 - Charged with 18 U.S.C. 111 Assaulting a Federal Officer 18 U.S.C. 231 (a)(3) Obstructing Law Enforcement Engaged In Official Duties Incident to Civil Disorder 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1 )&(2) Knowingly Entering or Remaining in any Restricted Building or Grounds Without Lawful Authority 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(D)(E)&(G) Violent Entry and Disorderly Conduct on Capitol Grounds This criminal complaint is based on these facts:
    • Senior Judge Paul L. Friedman Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link