JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    Mary Jones Verified listing

    • Date
      May 25, 2021
    • City/County
      Suffolk, Virginia
    • Type of Case
      Theft of monies and Real Estate
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Mary Jones

    Case Number

    CL15000254 CL1500-0987

    State or Country
    Virginia
    Judges

    Virginia Circuit Court Judges:

    Judge Thomas Padrick (Dispute Resolution Services, LLC),

    Supreme Court of Virginia: Hon. Donald W. Lemons, S. Bernard Goodwyn, William C. Mims, Cleo E. Powell, D. Arthur Kelsey, Stephen R. McCullough, Teresa M. Chafin, Charles S. Russell, Lawrence L. Koontz Jr., LeRoy F. Millette Jr. Past: Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr., Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser, Elizabeth A. McClanahan, Charles S. Russel, Elizabeth B. Lacy

    Defendant

    Mary Jones
    Daughter to Judge Wellington of Suffolk County

    MARY MARGARET JONES, Individually and as Executor of the Last Will
    and Testament of William Wellington Jones (dated November 10, 2014),

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Alison R. Zizzo Esq

    Vanessa Macias Stillman Esq

    Glen M. Robertson Esq

    GLEN M. ROBERTSON, Esquire
    WILCOTT RIVER GATES
    200 Bendix Road, Suite 300
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452
    (757)497-6633

    Alison R. Zizzo, Esquire
    MIDGETT PRETI OLANSEN PC
    2901 S. Lynnhaven Road, Suite 120
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452
    (757)687-8888
    Counsel for the plaintiff

    Others that affected your case

    Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission: H. Gayland Lyles, Robert H. Simpson, Honorable James E. Plowman, Marsha L. Garst VSB, Humes J. Franklin VSB, III, Terrie N. Thompson citizen, Kathleen M. Uston VSB Past: Donald Curry, Katherine Baldwin Burnett, The Honorable Bradley B. Cavedo, Judge Bryant L. Sugg, Judge H. Lee Chitwood, James P. Fisher VSB, Michael E. Untiedt VSB, H. Gayland Lyles Citizen, Robert Simpson Citizen

    Judges Comments

    The Judges Thomas H. Padrick lied in court

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Other
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.scribd.com/document/536297454/1-a-Page-1-JWG-v-4-ADA-Affidavite-Mary-Jones-9July21-Hearing-1

    Document Link 2

    https://www.scribd.com/document/536297789/07-09-21-Transcript-PDF-Ferguson-v-Jones-2-1

    Date
    May 25, 2021
    Type of Case
    Theft of monies and Real Estate
    The Court the Case was filed in

    Suffolk Circuit Court

    County/City:
    Suffolk, Virginia
    Plaintiff

    EDWIN GRIER FERGUSON 30 years ago started stealing from another - on line VSB disciplinary Letter for theft of funds

    IN RE: WILLIAM WELLINGTON JONES, Deceased: E. GRIER FERGUSON, as Executor of
    the last will and Testament of William Wellington Jones (dated June 16, 2006) and
    as Trustee of the William Wellington Jones Revocable Trust Agreement,

    Defendant Attorney

    Pro Se

    Comments

    The filing of ADA Advocate JWG

    VIRGINIA:

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF SUFFOLK

    IN RE: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER (JWG)
    Pro Se - ADA ADVOCATE Case No. CL 1500- 0987-00
    AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Other Case No. CL 1500- 254 & CL 1700-392

    IN RE: WILLIAM WELLINGTON JONES, DECEASED

    E. GRIER FERGUSON, as Executor of the Last Will and Testament of William Wellington Jones
    (dated June 16, 2006) and as Trustee of the William Jones Revocable Trust Agreement
    Plaintiff

    v.

    MARY MARGARET JONES, Individually and as Executive of the Last Will and Testament of William
    Wellington Jones (dated November 10, 2014)
    Defendant

    AFFIDAVIT OF JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, CERTIFIED ADA ADVOCATE
    FOR COURT HEARING JULY 9, 2021
    THE HEARING APPEARED TO BE ABOUT GIVING THE LAWYERS A SUMMARY JUDGEMENT /
    FINAL ORDER TO STEAL EVERYTHING THAT JUDGE JONES HAD LEFT HIS DAUGHTER,
    MARY MARGARET JONES

    THE HEARING CONSISTED OF JUDGE H.THOMAS PADRICK Jr LYING, BULLYING,
    INTIMIDATING THE PRO SE LITIGANT MARY MARGARET JONES and
    EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE JUDGE AND ATTORNEYS,
    ALLISON R. ZIZZO, GLEN M. ROBERTSON and VANESSA STILLMAN, and
    WITH A 2” - 3” NOTEBOOK THAT OPPOSING SIDE HAD and HAD GIVEN TO THE JUDGE
    PRIOR TO THE HEARING, and NEVER GAVE TO MARY JONES
    WHEN NOTEBOOK WAS REQUESTED, THE REQUEST WAS IGNORED and
    ZIZZO STATED: “IGNORE HER AND GO”,

    AS THE OPPOSING ATTORNEYS LEFT THE COURTROOM
    THE BAILIFF IN THE COURT CONFIRMED WITH, JUDGE PADRICK HE HAD THE NOTEBOOK
    and JUDGE PADRICK GAVE MARY MARGARET JONES THE COVER PAGE
    THE ENTIRE HEARING LACKED DUE PROCESS

    E. GRIER FERGUSON, THE OPPOSING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT AGAIN WAS A NO SHOW TO THE
    HEARING. MR. FERGUSON, in NOVEMBER 2019 WAS REPRIMANDED BY THE VSB FOR
    STEALING FROM OTHER TRUST ACCOUNTS

    1 The Record will show Judge Thomas Padrick stating that Mary Jones was yelling at him. This was not true he
    had asked her to take her mask off so he could hear her - Mary elevated her voice to ensure he could hear her.
    Judge Padrick 2 -3 times stated that Mary Margret Jones was yelling at him to have it on the record.
    1
    Comes now Janice Wolk Grenadier Certified ADA Advocate, and Founder JudicialPedia.com,
    pro se, files this Affidavit of Truth about the hearing IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF
    SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA, on Friday, July 9th, 2021, states as follows:

    1. I, Janice Wolk Grenadier pro se, am a U.S. citizen who resides in the City of Alexandria,
    Virginia.
    2. Judge H. Thomas Padrick, presiding, was appointed by Chief Justice Donald Lemons by the
    Supreme Court of Virginia only for Case No. CL 1500 - 987.
    3. That it appears in two other active Cases No. CL 1500 - 254 and Case No. CL 1700 - 392,
    that Judge Padrick admitted in court he did not have Jurisdiction.
    4. That Judge Padrick was appointed by Justice Donald Lemons to preside over three cases in
    the City of Alexandria in regard to Janice Wolk Grenadier.
    A. Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, who has several lawyers in the area, brought
    lawyers from Virginia Beach (4 ½ hours away) “FRIENDS” of Judge Padrick to the
    hearings.
    B. Further Judge Padrick in an attempt to Intimidate and Bully Janice Wolk Grenadier
    resorted to name calling and threats of Jail time, was disappointed that lawyers had not
    requested sanctions.
    C. Lawyer’s at Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders aka Troutman Sanders aka Mays &
    Valentine in 1990 Swindled $30,000.00 from Janice Wolk Grenadier to cover up Trust
    Theft by Divorce Lawyer, Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman.
    D. Judge Padrick further had a conversation prior to the hearing for Janice Wolk
    Grenadier in the City of Alexandria Circuit Court with Judge Donald Haddock who
    retired in or around 2010. Judge Haddock in 2008 stated to Janice Wolk Grenadier
    “She would never get a fair trial” because of his “LOVE LOVE LOVE” for Divorce
    Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. Judge Haddock all judges in the City of Alexandria
    had recused themselves, based on the rules of the court then and now clearly state: §
    17.1-105. Designation of judges to hold courts and assist other judges.
    B. If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any
    case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in
    their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or
    proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of
    record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief
    Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other
    court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial
    of such case.

    E. Judge Haddock for over two years chose the Judges - his and Ilona’s friends. Judge
    Haddock and the Supreme Court including Justice Donald Lemon ignored the law.
    Justice Lemon's, when I asked him the law used, stated I needed to file a Motion with
    the Supreme Court to see which laws were used. The Motion was denied because
    there was no law used, it was done for favor. The selection of Judges by Judge
    Haddock was done for favor and he also tampered with the Grand Jury.

    1. Case No. CW 1800 1465, Commissioner of Accounts Gary Lonergan’s case in
    RE: Janice Wolk Grenadier opened with no Notice to JWG with Troutman
    Pepper Hamilton Sanders to steal Real Estate
    2. Case No. CL 1800 - 1773, Case Voluntary Nonsuited by JWG
    3. Case No. CL 1900 - 2675, Quiet Title Suit denied all rights by Judge Padrick
    5. It should be noted Janice Wolk Grenadier has two cases in Orange County, Virginia for Ethics
    Violations against Judge Thomas Padrick and Justice Donald Lemons et al.
    1. Case No. CL 2100 0427 - 00 Orange County, Virginia Jury Trial Demanded
    https://judicialpedia.com/listing/government-grievance-virginia-courts-are-racistpredatory-and-dishonest-jwg-v-chief-justice-of-the-supreme-court-of-virginia-do
    nald-lemons-chief-judge-of-the-city-of-alexandria-circuit-court-donald/
    2. Case No. CL 2100 - 0704 - 00 On tampering of the Transcripts
    6. It should also be noted that Rhetta Daniel has filed Ethics Cases in Louisa County, VA, one is
    against Judge Padrick, Justice Lemons attorneys E. Grier Ferguson, Allison Zizzo, Vanessa
    Stillman and Glen Robertson et al, who in court on July 9, 2021 laughed when Judge Padrick
    made reference to it.
    A. Case No. CL 21-221 - Louisa, Virginia Circuit Court can be found:
    https://judicialpedia.com/listing/circuit-court-declaratory-judgement-injunctions-and-man
    damus-against-the-supreme-court-of-virginia-and-the-virginia-state-bar/
    B. Case No. CL 21-209 - Louisa, Virginia Circuit Court can be found:
    https://judicialpedia.com/listing/virginia-ethics-complaint-filed-in-louisa-circuit-court-agai
    nst-chief-justice-donald-w-lemons-and-karen-gould-executive-director-of-the-virginia-st
    ate-bar-et-al/

    7. The Plaintiff, E. GRIER FERGUSON July 9, 2021 hearing was not present for the hearing but,
    at the expense of the Will and or Trust had the following attorneys appear on his behalf:
    A. Allison R. Zizzo, Shareholder at Midgett Preti Olansen, appeared to be the lead
    attorney
    B. Vanessa Stillman, Associate at Midgett Preti Olansen, sat behind the other attorneys,
    did not speak but held the notebook which apparently had been given to the Judge in
    ex-parte communications directly or indirectly, but had not been given to Defendant
    Mary Jones.
    C. Glen M. Robertson, partner of Wolcott Rivers Gates Attorneys at Law during the
    hearing it was pointed out by Mary Margerat Jones, that Mr. Robertson had met with
    her for 1 hour regarding the same issues prior to him joining the E. Grier Ferguson’s
    team. When a Virginia State Bar complaint was filed based on his conflict of interest
    Mr. Robertson apparently couldn’t remember that hour or so meeting?
    8. That the appearance is Judge Padrick was chosen by Justice Lemons to take control of Mary
    Jone’s and Janice Wolk Grenadier’s cases to insure they were silenced and harmed while the
    Lawyers and past Judges were protected.
    9. Chief Justice Donald Lemons, Judge Thomas Padrick, Chief Judge Donald May Haddock and
    Judge James Clark , is/are licensed attorneys and Judges, who reside and have law licenses
    as well as are/is active as Ret Judges in Virginia. Chief Justice Donald Lemons of the
    Supreme Court in Richmond, Judge Thomas Padrick Ret from Virginia Beach area, Chief
    Judge Donald May Haddock Ret from the City of Alexandria and Judge James Clark who sits
    active in the City of Alexandria. It is the practice of the Supreme Court with retired Judges to
    bring them back as Judges to hear cases they want ruled a certain way.
    10. Judges in Virginia are an Enterprise of Secrecy through the Virginia Legislature, in collusion
    with the Virginia State Bar and ignoring the voices of the people and those that speak out
    against them. The Judges are chosen by who will work in collusion with the lawyers. It is a
    mafia style system. Virginia and South Carolina are the only two states who choose Judges
    this way. The other states elect their Judges leaving it to the people.
    11. The “JIRC” Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission who review complaints on Judges,
    shows Justice is for sale. JIRC is created by the Legislature as an judicial agency under the
    supervision of the Supreme Court of Virginia,

    12. Under the Virginia Statutes the public is led to believe “JIRC” is the correct agency to file
    complaints about Judge’s acts and actions. JIRC supposed responsibility to hold Judges
    accountable when they are in violation of the Judicial Canons, Rules, Regulation, Statues, the
    Federal and State Constitution and Federal and State Laws. However JIRC along with the
    State Bare have created RACIST, PREDATORY AND DISHONEST COURTS.
    13. There is no statute of limitations when Judges act unethically, or engage in crimes. Judges
    and Justices in Virginia must also be lawyers.
    14. Only the courts in Virginia have Jurisdiction to discipline a Judge.
    15. All Orders are “VOID” when a Judge enters them based on Bias.
    16. IF a Judge enters an order not based on law and fact, but enters one for or on “FAVOR” the
    Order is “VOID”
    17. The court has no jurisdiction to enter Orders that are not grounded on Law and Fact.
    18. I as a member of the public have the utmost concerns about the operations of the courts and
    the acts and actions of the Judges.
    19. Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote: ``The operations of the courts and the judicial
    conduct of judges are matters of utmost public concern.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS FROM HEARING JULY 9, 2021
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF SUFFOLK VIRGINIA
    20. On Friday, July 9, 2021 the courtroom was opened at or around 9:48 am.
    21. Posted on the Board outside of the Elevator it stated the case would be heard at 9:30 am, in
    courtroom 3.
    22. The online Docket stated 10:00 am for the hearing to be heard..
    23. That at no time was it clear to Defendant and JWG ADA Advocate as to the exact time the
    hearing would take place.
    24. Judge Padrick arrived at or around 10:18 am due to hearing cases 4 hours away.

    25. Judge Padrick made note of a “Bunch of Motions” filed by the Defendant.
    26. Judge Padrick brought up the motion of how the Transcripts had been tampered with - he then
    went into how long he had been a lawyer - judge etcetera and that he had never heard of that.
    27. Judge Padrick was being disingenuous.
    28. Mary Margreat Jones went on to explain the things left out of the transcripts.
    29. Janice Wolk Grenadier’s transcripts with all her hearings with Judge Padrick appeared to be
    "TAMPERED” with.
    30. That Judge Padrick was asked by JWG to do an “ORDER” for her cases in the City of
    Alexandria on or around May 5, 2021 for the audio. Judge Padrick ignored such a request.
    The Law is clear:
    § 8.01-420.3. Court reporters to provide transcripts; when recording may be
    stopped; use of transcript as evidence.
    Upon the request of any counsel of record, or of any party not represented by counsel, and upon payment of
    the reasonable cost thereof, the court reporter covering any proceeding shall provide the requesting party
    with a copy of the transcript of such proceeding or any requested portion thereof.
    The court shall not direct the court reporter to cease recording any portion of the proceeding without the
    consent of all parties or of their counsel of record.
    Whenever a party seeks to introduce the transcript or record of the testimony of a witness at an earlier trial,
    hearing or deposition, it shall not be necessary for the reporter to be present to prove the transcript or record,
    provided the reporter duly certifies, in writing, the accuracy of the transcript or record.
    This letter is to Request an Order from Judge Thomas Padric or Chief Justice Donald
    Lemons and a Demand to prevent that Paper documents, electronic records, including
    personnel records of evidence be preserved, this includes and is not limited to:
    ● Electronic records
    ● Hard drives, backup discs, etc.
    ● Phone records (call logs, voice mails, text messages, etc.)
    ● Social media posts and correspondence
    ● Any other material evidence
    31. That Judge Padrick should be concerned to ensure Due Process and fairness in the
    courtroom.
    32. That JWG filed suit against Judge Padrick and Justice Lemons whom he had stated in the
    court in one of JWG’s hearings that he had been sued with in the past.

    33. Judge Padrick then went on to discuss the lawsuits filed in Louisa County against him, and
    the opposing lawyers. They all laughed and found this to be funny, that a 200 page suit
    detailing the criminal activity of their acts and actions with Judge Daffron along with the
    apparent theft of Real Estate and monies that they have never been required to account
    for was funny.
    34. Judge Padrick then refused to Recuse himself even after he later admitted at the hearing that
    Ms. Jones's first attorney, Joshua Coe, had been a student of Judge Padrick who has been
    teaching at Regent University in Virginia Beach where Atty Alison Zizzo also went to law school. It
    should be noted that Joshua Coe answered the first Discovery, answers that Judge Padrick would
    not accept.
    35. Judge Padrick then went on to state the only thing they were there for was to decide if Mr.
    Ferguson’s will that gave him control from 2006 was valid, and / or Mary Jones' will which
    came after had standing.
    36. Judge Padrick said he would have liked to have a Jury Trial to see this but, was going to
    give the opposing side the Final Judgement for the Supreme Court to decide.
    37. The reason Judge Padrick and the opposing side gave was very “FRIVOLOUS” it was due
    to them not liking her discovery answers. But, never stated which ones or what was wrong
    with them.
    38. Judge Padrick appeared just as in JWG’s Case to be “FRIENDS” with the opposing
    attorneys.
    39. That Judge Padirck did not care about an accounting for the Trust and was not going
    there,
    40. Judge Padrick ruled the court felt ALL of Pro Se Mary Jones motions were not germane.
    41. It was stated Mary Jones would not be allowed to have expert witness or expert
    discovery? Mary Jones would not be allowed to supplement in a trial - but, since there
    wasn’t ever going to be one - it didn't matter.
    42. Mary Jones stated clearly she wanted and was fighting for “True Justice”.
    43. That at or around 10:41 Judge Padrick after asking Mary to take off her mask so he could
    hear her then kept stating her elevated voice should be noted as yelling at him for the
    record.
    44. Further discussion on the Discovery Abuse by the Plaintiff and his lawyers to Mary Jones.
    45. Judge Padtick ignored that the opposing side did not answer discovery - his friends.
    46. Discussion on how Glen Robertson had a possible issue as he could not remember
    meeting with Mary Jones for about an hour prior to joining Ferguson's team. Which
    created a conflict ignored by this court.
    7
    47. The opposing side entered into the record a document that they took out of a 2” - 3”
    notebook and asked the Judge if he had received it.
    48. Court ended on or around 11:11 am. At which point JWG noticed Mary did not have the
    notebook that through ex-parte communicating the lawyers had given to the Judge a
    notebook.
    49. ADA Advocate asked the opposing side to give Mary Jones a notebook as Mary had
    confirmed she had not received such a notebook.
    50. Lead attorney Allison R. Zizzo stated to Vanassa Stillman and Glenn Robertson to not
    respond to me and to get out of the courtroom ie: “IGNORE HER AND GO”
    51. JWG made the comment to Allison Zizzo regarding ex parte communications with the
    Judge, as she ran out of the courtroom refusing to give Mary Jones a notebook as she
    had the Judge.
    52. JWG then made the comment to Lawyer Zizzo “You wouldn’t know the truth if it bit you in
    the ass”.
    53. This got the Bailiffs attention and he stated he would go back to the Judge and find out if
    he had been given the notebook.
    54. The Judge stated through the Bailiff he had been given the notebook which would have
    been ex parte communications and the Bailiff gave Mary Jones what he called the Cover
    Sheet of the notebook to confirm it.
    55. That is why Judge Patrick was chosen for this case by Justice Lemons to clear it up and
    give his “Friends” to opposing lawyers whatever they wanted.
    56. Further in the hearing Lead attorney Zizzo stated how upset she was that this was still
    going on and she wanted the case over. But, she also made it clear she was not willing to
    turn the land over to Mary and end the case.
    57. That Judge Patrick as a Judge could have ended the case today - handed Mary the only
    thing left in the estate, the Land. But, this was again a lie. The lawyers want to sll the land
    to their friends and continue to milk the Estate till it has no money left. This is the pattern
    and practice of the Virginia courts.
    58. Lead lawyer Zizzo stated they already had a contract on the property. What is the back
    end deal between Ferguson, and his lawyers Zizzo, Stillman and Robertson.
    59. It was obvious this hearing was to further loot the estate and ensure Mary Jones was
    left with nothing.
    60. That the entire hearing was like “Kangaroo Court” that lacked the following Elements of
    Due Process:

    a. Equality. The system must not discriminate procedurally between parties. If one
    party is entitled to counsel, then all are entitled. If notice is provided one, it must
    be provided for all. The essential requirement for Equality is that the system
    provide a “level playing field" for the disputants. Discrimination in appearance or
    fact is an anathema to the Equality required to satisfy due process.
    b. Economy. The cost of access to the system must not be a barrier to its use or
    operate to the disadvantage of one or the other parties. This means that
    grievance and arbitration proceedings should not be made a Board profit center
    and, in fact, may have to become subsidized to assure open access.
    c. Expedition. As “justice delayed is frequently justice denied,” there is an
    affirmative obligation on the part of the system to expedite ethics and
    arbitration proceedings. This does not foreclose orderly procedure with
    adequate time to ensure notice, time to prepare, opportunity to identify and
    gather witnesses, and otherwise develop facts and arguments. It does, however,
    foreclose dilatory tactics, unreasonable extension of time, and protraction of
    hearings.
    d. Evidence. The system must be designed and function to elicit evidence, not
    assumptions; proof, not presumptions. While strict rules of evidence in the
    judicial sense do not apply, there must be control of what is admitted as relevant
    and judgment as to what is mere speculation and hearsay designed to prejudice
    rather than inform.
    e. Equity. The system must produce decisions that reflect a sense and substance
    of “rightness” and “reasonableness.” In matters involving unethical conduct, the
    punishment should fit the offense. The judgment should reflect consideration of
    extenuating circumstances and a balancing of competing values and objectives.
    Moreover, the predictability, consistency, and uniformity of the system’s
    performance is an important measure of Equity.
    A Pro Se Litigant

    61. Such conduct by the Plaintiffs attorneys constitutes Ethical Misconduct and other civil or
    criminal misconduct in violation of the following provisions of the Virginia Constitution , the
    Constitution of the United States of America, and the Professional Code of Ethics.

    62. That this court by appearance has violated Mary Margaret Jones, right to Due Process as
    stated in the 5th and 14th Amendment, when dening fair hearings and showing a bias to Mary
    Margaret Jones.

    63. The law is very clear a pro se litigant is to be given equal treatment if not special treatment, especially in
    a case where the intervening Person is a lawyer and has the financial ability to bring in as many
    powerful unscrupulous lawyers to defend her criminal actions.
    "Pro se plaintif s are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements.
    Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se
    complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the suf iciency
    of a pro se complaint than they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See
    e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980)
    (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d
    652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir.1989) (per
    curiam). In order to justify the dismissal of a pro se complaint, it must be " 'beyond
    doubt that the plaintif can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would
    entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting
    Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).

    64. “Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law
    has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. “In re Murchinson, 349 U.S.
    133, 136 (1955)”
    No of icer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the of icers of the
    government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.”
    Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261
    (1882)” “Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the
    Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the
    United States as well.” State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to
    safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35,
    96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)”

    To ensure Justice and Fairness in this court Janice Wolk Grenadier as an ADAAdvocate sees that an
    investigation is necessary by the correct authorities.

    I hereby state that the information above is true, to the best of my knowledge. I also confirm that the
    information here is both accurate and complete, and relevant information has not been omitted to the best of my knowledge.

    Respectfully Submitted,

    July 16, 2021
    Janice Wolk Grenadier
    15 W. Spring St.
    Alexandria, VA 22301
    202-368-7178
    jwgrenadier@gmail.com

    SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this _____ day of July, 2021, by Janice Wolk Grenadier.
    NOTARY PUBLIC FOR City of Alexandria, Virginia,
    My Commission Expires:
    Serial Number

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    Virginia Judiciary Treason "OK" with JIRC Verified listing

    • JIRC Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission For Acts & Actions of SCV Chief Justices Bernard Goodwyn, Donald Lemons, Cynthia Kinser "Fixer" Judges in Richmond, City of Alexandria, Fairfax, Orange, Culpeper & Virginia Beach Virginia
    • Divorce, Constitutional, Civil Rights, "Fake" illegal Foreclosure, unlawful arrest & assaualt by a Sheriff,
    • Chief Justice Bernard Goodwyn, Chief Justice Donald Lemmons Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser

    SCOTUS Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation into USDC of District of Columbia for Political & Religions BIAS by Judges et al Verified listing

    • The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • No. 23-7758
    • Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation of Political & Religious bias of the Judges
    • John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, ... Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, ... Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, ... Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, ... Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, ... Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, ... Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955. He married Jane Sullivan in 1996 and they have two children - Josephine and Jack. He received an A.B. from Harvard College in 1976 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1979. He served as a law clerk for Judge Henry J. Friendly of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1979–1980, and as a law clerk for then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1980 Term. He served as a Special Assistant to the Attorney General of the United States from 1981–1982, Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan, White House Counsel’s Office from 1982–1986, and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General from 1989–1993. From 1986–1989 and 1993–2003, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. He served as a Judge on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2003–2005. Nominated as Chief Justice of the United States by President George W. Bush, he assumed that office on September 29, 2005. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, was born in the Pinpoint community near Savannah, Georgia on June 23, 1948. He attended Conception Seminary from 1967-1968 and received an A.B., cum laude, from College of the Holy Cross in 1971 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1974. He was admitted to law practice in Missouri in 1974, and served as an Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, 1974-1977; an attorney with the Monsanto Company, 1977-1979; and Legislative Assistant to Senator John Danforth, 1979-1981. From 1981–1982 he served as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education, and as Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1982-1990. From 1990–1991, he served as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court and he took his seat October 23, 1991. He married Virginia Lamp on May 30, 1987 and has one child, Jamal Adeen by a previous marriage. Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, was born in Trenton, New Jersey, on April 1, 1950. He married Martha-Ann Bomgardner in 1985, and has two children - Philip and Laura. He served as a law clerk for Leonard I. Garth of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1976–1977. He served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977–1981, as Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981–1985, as Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985–1987, and as U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1987–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1990. President George W. Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat January 31, 2006. Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and a member of Phi Beta Kappa and receiving the Pyne Prize, the highest academic honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. In 1997, she was nominated by President Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where she served from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009. Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960. She received an A.B. from Princeton in 1981, an M. Phil. from Oxford in 1983, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1986. She clerked for Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1986-1987 and for Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1987 Term. After briefly practicing law at a Washington, D.C. law firm, she became a law professor, first at the University of Chicago Law School and later at Harvard Law School. She also served for four years in the Clinton Administration, as Associate Counsel to the President and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. Between 2003 and 2009, she served as the Dean of Harvard Law School. In 2009, President Obama nominated her as the Solicitor General of the United States. A year later, the President nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 10, 2010. She took her seat on August 7, 2010. Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, was born in Denver, Colorado, August 29, 1967. He and his wife Louise have two daughters. He received a B.A. from Columbia University, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and a D.Phil. from Oxford University. He served as a law clerk to Judge David B. Sentelle of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and as a law clerk to Justice Byron White and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the Supreme Court of the United States. From 1995–2005, he was in private practice, and from 2005–2006 he was Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in 2006. He served on the Standing Committee on Rules for Practice and Procedure of the U.S. Judicial Conference, and as chairman of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure. He taught at the University of Colorado Law School. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on April 10, 2017. Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on February 12, 1965. He married Ashley Estes in 2004, and they have two daughters - Margaret and Liza. He received a B.A. from Yale College in 1987 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1990. He served as a law clerk for Judge Walter Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1990-1991, for Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 1991-1992, and for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1993 Term. In 1992-1993, he was an attorney in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. From 1994 to 1997 and for a period in 1998, he was Associate Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel. He was a partner at a Washington, D.C., law firm from 1997 to 1998 and again from 1999 to 2001. From 2001 to 2003, he was Associate Counsel and then Senior Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush. From 2003 to 2006, he was Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary for President Bush. He was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2006. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on October 6, 2018. Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, on January 28, 1972. She married Jesse M. Barrett in 1999, and they have seven children - Emma, Vivian, Tess, John Peter, Liam, Juliet, and Benjamin. She received a B.A. from Rhodes College in 1994 and a J.D. from Notre Dame Law School in 1997. She served as a law clerk for Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and for Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1998 Term. After two years in private law practice in Washington, D.C., she became a law professor, joining the faculty of Notre Dame Law School in 2002. She was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017. President Donald J. Trump nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat on October 27, 2020. Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on September 14, 1970. She married Patrick Jackson in 1996, and they have two daughters. She received an A.B., magna cum laude, from Harvard-Radcliffe College in 1992, and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1996. She served as a law clerk for Judge Patti B. Saris of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts from 1996 to 1997, Judge Bruce M. Selya of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1999 Term. After three years in private practice, she worked as an attorney at the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2003 to 2005. From 2005 to 2007, she served as an assistant federal public defender in Washington, D.C., and from 2007 to 2010, she was in private practice. She served as a Vice Chair and Commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2010 to 2014. In 2012, President Barack Obama nominated her to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where she served from 2013 to 2021. She was appointed to the Defender Services Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States in 2017, and the Supreme Court Fellows Commission in 2019. President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2021 and then nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 2022. She took her seat on June 30, 2022. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Sacramento, California, July 23, 1936. He married Mary Davis and has three children. He received his B.A. from Stanford University and the London School of Economics, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He was in private practice in San Francisco, California from 1961–1963, as well as in Sacramento, California from 1963–1975. From 1965 to 1988, he was a Professor of Constitutional Law at the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific. He has served in numerous positions during his career, including a member of the California Army National Guard in 1961, the board of the Federal Judicial Center from 1987–1988, and two committees of the Judicial Conference of the United States: the Advisory Panel on Financial Disclosure Reports and Judicial Activities, subsequently renamed the Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct, from 1979–1987, and the Committee on Pacific Territories from 1979–1990, which he chaired from 1982–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1975. President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988. Justice Kennedy retired from the Supreme Court on July 31, 2018. David Hackett Souter, Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, September 17, 1939. He graduated from Harvard College, from which he received his A.B. After two years as a Rhodes Scholar at Magdalen College, Oxford, he received an A.B. in Jurisprudence from Oxford University and an M.A. in 1963. After receiving an LL.B. from Harvard Law School, he was an associate at Orr and Reno in Concord, New Hampshire from 1966 to 1968, when he became an Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1971, he became Deputy Attorney General and in 1976, Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1978, he was named an Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire, and was appointed to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire as an Associate Justice in 1983. He became a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on May 25, 1990. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990. Justice Souter retired from the Supreme Court on June 29, 2009. Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in San Francisco, California, August 15, 1938. He married Joanna Hare in 1967, and has three children - Chloe, Nell, and Michael. He received an A.B. from Stanford University, a B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford, and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He served as a law clerk to Justice Arthur Goldberg of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1964 Term, as a Special Assistant to the Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Antitrust, 1965–1967, as an Assistant Special Prosecutor of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 1973, as Special Counsel of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, 1974–1975, and as Chief Counsel of the committee, 1979–1980. He was an Assistant Professor, Professor of Law, and Lecturer at Harvard Law School, 1967–1994, a Professor at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government, 1977–1980, and a Visiting Professor at the College of Law, Sydney, Australia and at the University of Rome. From 1980–1990, he served as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and as its Chief Judge, 1990–1994. He also served as a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, 1990–1994, and of the United States Sentencing Commission, 1985–1989. President Clinton nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat August 3, 1994. Justice Breyer retired from the Supreme Court on June 30, 2022
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link