JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    Michigan, Sidney Powell: TIMOTHY KING et al v. Gov GRETCHEN WHITMER, et al Verified listing

    • Date
      November 25, 2020
    • City/County
      Detroit, Michigan
    • Type of Case
      COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Michigan, Sidney Powell: TIMOTHY KING et al v. Gov GRETCHEN WHITMER, et al

    Case Number

    2:20-cv-13134-LVP - RSW

    State or Country
    Michigan
    Judges

    Judge Linda V. Parker
    Judge R. Steven Whalen

    Defendant

    GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official
    capacity as Governor of the State of
    Michigan, JOCELYN BENSON, in her
    official capacity as Michigan Secretary of
    State and the Michigan BOARD OFSTATE
    CANVASSERS.

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Website
    • Website
    • Website
    • Twitter
    • Website
    • Website
    • Twitter
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

    Date
    November 25, 2020
    Type of Case
    COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    The Court the Case was filed in

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

    County/City:
    Detroit, Michigan
    Plaintiff

    TIMOTHY KING,MARIAN ELLEN
    SHERIDAN, JOHN EARL HAGGARD,
    CHARLES JAMES RITCHARD, JAMES
    DAVID HOOPER and DAREN WADE
    RUBINGH

    Comments

    COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY,
    AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

    NATURE OF THE ACTION
    1. This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of the
    Michigan Election Code, see, e.g., MCL §§ 168.730-738, in addition to the Election and Electors
    Clauses and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution violations that occurred during the
    2020 General Election throughout the State of Michigan,1as set forth in the affidavits of dozens
    of eye witnesses and the statistical anomalies and mathematical impossibilities detailed in the
    affidavits of expert witnesses.
    2. The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and
    fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as President of
    the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally
    troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
    created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. This Complaint details an
    especially egregious range of conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this
    conduct occurred throughout the State at the direction of Michigan state election officials.
    3. The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their
    collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of
    thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that
    constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the
    eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots
    required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud,
    illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and
    legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.
    Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation
    4. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting
    Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) used by the MichiganBoard of State Canvassers. The
    Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became
    Sequoia in the United States.
    5. Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to
    ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was needed to make
    certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election.See Exh. 1, Redacted
    Declaration of Dominion Venezuela Whistleblower (“Dominion Whistleblower Report”).
    Notably, Chavez “won” every election thereafter.
    6. As set forth in the DominionWhistleblower Report, the Smartmatic software was
    contrived through a criminal conspiracy to manipulate Venezuelan elections in favor of dictator
    Hugo Chavez:
    Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of an electronic
    voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as Smartmatic and the
    leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government. This conspiracy
    specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the person in charge of the
    National Electoral Council named Jorge Rodriguez, and principals,
    representatives, and personnel from Smartmatic. The purpose of this conspiracy
    was to create and operate a voting system that could change the votes in elections
    from votes against persons running the Venezuelan government to votes in their
    favor in order to maintain control of the government. In mid-February of 2009,
    there was a national referendum to change theConstitution of Venezuela to end
    term limits for elected officials, including the President of Venezuela. The
    referendum passed. This permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited
    number of times. . . .
    Smartmatic’s electoral technology was called “Sistema de Gestión Electoral” (the
    “Electoral Management System”). Smartmatic was a pioneer in this area of
    computing systems. Their system provided for transmission of voting data over
    the internet to a computerized central tabulating center. The voting machines
    themselves had a digital display, fingerprint recognition feature to identify the
    voter, and printed out the voter’s ballot. The voter’s thumbprint was linked to a
    computerized record of that voter’s identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
    entire system. Id. ¶¶ 10 & 14.
    7. A core requirement of the Smartmatic software design ultimately adopted by
    Dominion for the Michigan’s elections was the software’s ability to hide its manipulation of
    votes from any audit. As the whistleblower explains:
    Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way that the
    system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the
    software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their
    thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a
    record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not
    tracked to the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
    setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that
    there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the
    fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed vote. Smartmatic agreed to
    create such a system and produced the software and hardware that accomplished
    that result for President Chavez.Id. ¶15.
    8. The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple audit to
    reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes. First, the system's central
    accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time
    stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs.
    Essentially this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove
    log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting
    tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people. See
    Exh. 107, August 24, 2020 Declaration of HarriHursti, ¶¶45-48).

    9. Indeed, under the professional standards within the industry in auditing and
    forensic analysis, when a log is unprotected, and can be altered, it can no longer serve the
    purpose of an audit log.There is incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical
    security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to
    the internet in violation of professional standards, which violates federal election law on the
    preservation of evidence.
    10. In deciding to award Dominion a$25 million, ten-year contract (to a Dominion
    project team led by Kelly Garrett, former Deputy Director of the Michigan Democratic Party),
    and then certifying Dominion software, Michigan officials disregarded all the concerns that
    caused Dominion software to be rejected by the Texas Board of elections in 2018 because it was
    deemed vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable manipulation. An industry expert, Dr.
    Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of Computer Science and Election Security Expert has
    recently observed, with reference to Dominion Voting machines: "I figured out how to make a
    slightly different computer program that just before the polls were closed, it switches some votes
    around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer program into a memory chip and
    now to hack a voting machine you just need 7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver."3
    11. Plaintiff’s expert witness, Russell James Ramsland, Jr. (Exh. 101, “Ramsland
    Affidavit”), has concluded that Dominion alone is responsible for the injection, or fabrication, of
    289,866 illegal votes in Michigan, that must be disregarded. This is almost twice the number of
    Mr. Biden’s purported lead in the Michigan vote (without consideration of the additional illegal,
    ineligible, duplicate or fictitious votes due to the unlawful conduct outlined below), and thus by
    itself is grounds to set aside the 2020 General Election and grant the declaratory and injunctive
    relief requested herein.
    12. In addition to the Dominion computer fraud, this Complaint identifies several
    additional categories of “traditional” voting fraud and Michigan Election Code violations,
    supplemented by healthy doses of harassment, intimidation, discrimination, abuse and even
    physical removal of Republican poll challengers to eliminate any semblance of transparency,
    objectivity or fairness from the vote counting process. While this illegal conduct by election
    workers and state, county and city employees in concert with Dominion, even if considered in
    isolation, the following three categories of systematic violations of the Michigan Election Code
    cast significant doubt on the results of the election and mandate this Court to set aside the 2020
    General Election and grant the declaratory and injunctive relief requested herein.
    Fact Witness Testimony of Voting Fraud & Other Illegal Conduct
    13. There were three broad categories of illegal conduct by election workers in
    collaboration with other employee state, county and/or city employees and Democratic poll
    watchers and activists.First, to facilitate and cover-up the voting fraud and counting of
    fraudulent, illegal or ineligible voters, election workers:
    A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all
    Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;
    B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view
    ballot handling, processing, or counting and
    lockedcredentialedchallengersoutofthe counting room so they could not observe
    the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots wereprocessed;
    C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical
    removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF
    Center;
    D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored
    Democratic poll watchers;
    E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined
    herein;
    F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and
    other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without
    allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;
    G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat
    ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them
    vote and coach them for whom to vote;
    H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered
    Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and
    I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit
    employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory
    behavior.
    14. Second, election workers illegally forged, added, removed or otherwise altered
    information on ballots, the Qualified Voter File (QVF) and Other Voting Records, including:
    A. Fraudulently adding “tens of thousands” of new ballots and/or new voters to QVF
    in two separate batches on November 4, 2020, all or nearly all of which were
    votes for Joe Biden;
    B. Forging voter information and fraudulently adding new voters to the QVF Voters,
    in particular, e.g., when a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker
    assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had
    notvoted and recordedthesenewvotersashavingabirthdate of1/1/1900;
    C. Changing dates on absenteeballots received after 8:00 PM Election Day deadline
    to indicate that such ballots were received before the deadline;
    D. Changing Votes for Trump and other Republican candidates; and
    E. Added votes to “undervote” ballots and removing votes from “Over-Votes”.
    15. Third, election workers committed several additional categories of violations of
    the Michigan Election Code to enable them to accept and count other illegal, ineligible or
    duplicate ballots, or reject Trump or Republican ballots, including:
    A. Permitting illegal double voting by persons that had voted by absentee ballot and
    in person;
    B. Counting ineligible ballots – and in many cases – multiple times;
    C. Counting ballots without signatures, or without attempting to match signatures,
    and ballots without postmarks, pursuant to direct instructions from Defendants;
    D. Counting “spoiled” ballots;
    E. Systematic violations of ballot secrecy requirements;
    F. Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot
    boxes, without any chain of custody, and withoutenvelopes, after the 8:00 PM
    Election Day deadline, in particular, the tens of thousands of ballots that arrived
    on November 4, 2020; and
    G. Accepting and counting ballots from deceased voters.
    Expert Witness Testimony Regarding Voting Fraud
    16. In addition to the above fact witnesses, this Complaint presents expert witness
    testimony demonstrating that several hundred thousand illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely
    fictitious votes must be thrown out, in particular: (1) a report from Russel Ramsland, Jr. showing
    the “physical impossibility” of nearly 385,000 votes injected by four precincts/township on
    November 4, 2020, that resulted in the counting of nearly 290,000 more ballots processed than
    available capacity (which is based on statistical analysis that is independent of his analysis of
    Dominion’s flaws); (2) a report from Dr. William Briggs, showing that there were approximately
    60,000 absentee ballots listed as “unreturned” by voters that either never requested them, or that
    requested and returned their ballots; and (3) a report from Dr. Eric Quinell analyzing the
    anomalous turnout figures in Wayne and Oakland Counties showing that Biden gained nearly
    100% and frequently more than 100% of all “new” voters in certain townships/precincts over
    2016, and thus indicated that nearly 87,000 anomalous and likely fraudulent votes from these
    precincts.
    17. As explained and demonstrated in the accompanying redacted declaration of a
    former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience
    gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence, the Dominion software was accessed by
    agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including
    the most recent US general election in 2020. This Declaration further includes a copy of the
    patent records for Dominion Systems in which Eric Coomer is listed as the first of the inventors
    of Dominion Voting Systems. (See Attached hereto as Ex. 105, copy of redacted witness
    affidavit, November 23, 2020).
    18. Expert Navid Keshavarez-Nia explains that US intelligence services had
    developed tools to infiltrate foreign voting systems including Dominion. He states that
    Dominion's software is vulnerable to data manipulation by unauthorized means and permitted
    election data to be altered in all battleground states. He concludes that hundreds of thousands of
    votes that were cast for President Trump in the 2020 general election were transferred to former
    Vice-President Biden. (Ex. 109).
    19. These and other “irregularities” provide this Court grounds to set aside the results
    of the 2020 General Election and provide the other declaratory and injunctive relief requested
    herein.

    ReadMore: https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    Virginia Judiciary Treason "OK" with JIRC Verified listing

    • JIRC Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission For Acts & Actions of SCV Chief Justices Bernard Goodwyn, Donald Lemons, Cynthia Kinser "Fixer" Judges in Richmond, City of Alexandria, Fairfax, Orange, Culpeper & Virginia Beach Virginia
    • Divorce, Constitutional, Civil Rights, "Fake" illegal Foreclosure, unlawful arrest & assaualt by a Sheriff,
    • Chief Justice Bernard Goodwyn, Chief Justice Donald Lemmons Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser

    SCOTUS Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation into USDC of District of Columbia for Political & Religions BIAS by Judges et al Verified listing

    • The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • No. 23-7758
    • Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation of Political & Religious bias of the Judges
    • John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, ... Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, ... Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, ... Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, ... Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, ... Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, ... Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955. He married Jane Sullivan in 1996 and they have two children - Josephine and Jack. He received an A.B. from Harvard College in 1976 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1979. He served as a law clerk for Judge Henry J. Friendly of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1979–1980, and as a law clerk for then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1980 Term. He served as a Special Assistant to the Attorney General of the United States from 1981–1982, Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan, White House Counsel’s Office from 1982–1986, and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General from 1989–1993. From 1986–1989 and 1993–2003, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. He served as a Judge on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2003–2005. Nominated as Chief Justice of the United States by President George W. Bush, he assumed that office on September 29, 2005. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, was born in the Pinpoint community near Savannah, Georgia on June 23, 1948. He attended Conception Seminary from 1967-1968 and received an A.B., cum laude, from College of the Holy Cross in 1971 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1974. He was admitted to law practice in Missouri in 1974, and served as an Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, 1974-1977; an attorney with the Monsanto Company, 1977-1979; and Legislative Assistant to Senator John Danforth, 1979-1981. From 1981–1982 he served as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education, and as Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1982-1990. From 1990–1991, he served as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court and he took his seat October 23, 1991. He married Virginia Lamp on May 30, 1987 and has one child, Jamal Adeen by a previous marriage. Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, was born in Trenton, New Jersey, on April 1, 1950. He married Martha-Ann Bomgardner in 1985, and has two children - Philip and Laura. He served as a law clerk for Leonard I. Garth of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1976–1977. He served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977–1981, as Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981–1985, as Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985–1987, and as U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1987–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1990. President George W. Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat January 31, 2006. Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and a member of Phi Beta Kappa and receiving the Pyne Prize, the highest academic honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. In 1997, she was nominated by President Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where she served from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009. Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960. She received an A.B. from Princeton in 1981, an M. Phil. from Oxford in 1983, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1986. She clerked for Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1986-1987 and for Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1987 Term. After briefly practicing law at a Washington, D.C. law firm, she became a law professor, first at the University of Chicago Law School and later at Harvard Law School. She also served for four years in the Clinton Administration, as Associate Counsel to the President and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. Between 2003 and 2009, she served as the Dean of Harvard Law School. In 2009, President Obama nominated her as the Solicitor General of the United States. A year later, the President nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 10, 2010. She took her seat on August 7, 2010. Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, was born in Denver, Colorado, August 29, 1967. He and his wife Louise have two daughters. He received a B.A. from Columbia University, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and a D.Phil. from Oxford University. He served as a law clerk to Judge David B. Sentelle of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and as a law clerk to Justice Byron White and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the Supreme Court of the United States. From 1995–2005, he was in private practice, and from 2005–2006 he was Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in 2006. He served on the Standing Committee on Rules for Practice and Procedure of the U.S. Judicial Conference, and as chairman of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure. He taught at the University of Colorado Law School. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on April 10, 2017. Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on February 12, 1965. He married Ashley Estes in 2004, and they have two daughters - Margaret and Liza. He received a B.A. from Yale College in 1987 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1990. He served as a law clerk for Judge Walter Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1990-1991, for Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 1991-1992, and for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1993 Term. In 1992-1993, he was an attorney in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. From 1994 to 1997 and for a period in 1998, he was Associate Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel. He was a partner at a Washington, D.C., law firm from 1997 to 1998 and again from 1999 to 2001. From 2001 to 2003, he was Associate Counsel and then Senior Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush. From 2003 to 2006, he was Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary for President Bush. He was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2006. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on October 6, 2018. Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, on January 28, 1972. She married Jesse M. Barrett in 1999, and they have seven children - Emma, Vivian, Tess, John Peter, Liam, Juliet, and Benjamin. She received a B.A. from Rhodes College in 1994 and a J.D. from Notre Dame Law School in 1997. She served as a law clerk for Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and for Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1998 Term. After two years in private law practice in Washington, D.C., she became a law professor, joining the faculty of Notre Dame Law School in 2002. She was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017. President Donald J. Trump nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat on October 27, 2020. Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on September 14, 1970. She married Patrick Jackson in 1996, and they have two daughters. She received an A.B., magna cum laude, from Harvard-Radcliffe College in 1992, and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1996. She served as a law clerk for Judge Patti B. Saris of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts from 1996 to 1997, Judge Bruce M. Selya of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1999 Term. After three years in private practice, she worked as an attorney at the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2003 to 2005. From 2005 to 2007, she served as an assistant federal public defender in Washington, D.C., and from 2007 to 2010, she was in private practice. She served as a Vice Chair and Commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2010 to 2014. In 2012, President Barack Obama nominated her to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where she served from 2013 to 2021. She was appointed to the Defender Services Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States in 2017, and the Supreme Court Fellows Commission in 2019. President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2021 and then nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 2022. She took her seat on June 30, 2022. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Sacramento, California, July 23, 1936. He married Mary Davis and has three children. He received his B.A. from Stanford University and the London School of Economics, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He was in private practice in San Francisco, California from 1961–1963, as well as in Sacramento, California from 1963–1975. From 1965 to 1988, he was a Professor of Constitutional Law at the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific. He has served in numerous positions during his career, including a member of the California Army National Guard in 1961, the board of the Federal Judicial Center from 1987–1988, and two committees of the Judicial Conference of the United States: the Advisory Panel on Financial Disclosure Reports and Judicial Activities, subsequently renamed the Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct, from 1979–1987, and the Committee on Pacific Territories from 1979–1990, which he chaired from 1982–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1975. President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988. Justice Kennedy retired from the Supreme Court on July 31, 2018. David Hackett Souter, Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, September 17, 1939. He graduated from Harvard College, from which he received his A.B. After two years as a Rhodes Scholar at Magdalen College, Oxford, he received an A.B. in Jurisprudence from Oxford University and an M.A. in 1963. After receiving an LL.B. from Harvard Law School, he was an associate at Orr and Reno in Concord, New Hampshire from 1966 to 1968, when he became an Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1971, he became Deputy Attorney General and in 1976, Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1978, he was named an Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire, and was appointed to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire as an Associate Justice in 1983. He became a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on May 25, 1990. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990. Justice Souter retired from the Supreme Court on June 29, 2009. Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in San Francisco, California, August 15, 1938. He married Joanna Hare in 1967, and has three children - Chloe, Nell, and Michael. He received an A.B. from Stanford University, a B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford, and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He served as a law clerk to Justice Arthur Goldberg of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1964 Term, as a Special Assistant to the Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Antitrust, 1965–1967, as an Assistant Special Prosecutor of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 1973, as Special Counsel of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, 1974–1975, and as Chief Counsel of the committee, 1979–1980. He was an Assistant Professor, Professor of Law, and Lecturer at Harvard Law School, 1967–1994, a Professor at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government, 1977–1980, and a Visiting Professor at the College of Law, Sydney, Australia and at the University of Rome. From 1980–1990, he served as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and as its Chief Judge, 1990–1994. He also served as a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, 1990–1994, and of the United States Sentencing Commission, 1985–1989. President Clinton nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat August 3, 1994. Justice Breyer retired from the Supreme Court on June 30, 2022
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link