JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    PAGE v. COMEY: The FBI in 2014 did a directive in Virginia and other places ALL Public Corruption to be investigated by DC FBI the Cover- Up begins Verified listing

    • Date
      November 27, 2020
    • City/County
      Washington DC
    • Type of Case
      Civil Rights 29:1983
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    PAGE v. COMEY: The FBI in 2014 did a directive in Virginia and other places ALL Public Corruption to be investigated by DC FBI the Cover- Up begins

    Case Number

    1:20-cv-03460

    State or Country
    District of Columbia
    Judges

    TBD

    Defendant

    JAMES COMEY
    7845 Westmont Ln.
    McLean, VA 22101,

    ANDREW McCABE
    42751 Summerhouse Pl.
    Broadlands, VA 20148,

    KEVIN CLINESMITH
    1375 Keyon St. NW, Apt. 607
    Washington D.C., 20010,

    PETER STRZOK
    3214 Prince William Dr.
    Fairfax, VA 22031,

    LISA PAGE
    1229 D St. NE
    Washington D.C., 20002,

    JOE PIENTKA III
    3227 20th Rd. N
    Arlington, VA 22207

    STEPHEN SOMMA
    6 Overlook Dr.
    Madison, CT 06443,

    BRIAN J. AUTEN
    10245 Quiet Pond Ter.
    Burke, VA 22105,

    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, DC 20530-0001,

    FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATON,
    935 Pennsylvania Ave NW,
    Washington, DC 20535,

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, DC 20530-0001,

    JOHN DOES 1-10, and
    JANE DOES 1-10,

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Leslie S McAdoo Gordon
    (202) 293-0534
    Fax: (202) 478-2095
    McAdoo Gordon & Associates, P.C.
    1140 19th St., NW
    Suite 602
    Washington, DC 20036

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    LEAD ATTORNEY

    Timothy Parlatore
    (212) 679-6312
    Fax: (212) 202-4787
    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Other
    • Website
    • Other
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18694445/page-v-comey/

    Document Link 2

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.224507/gov.uscourts.dcd.224507.1.0.pdf

    Document Link 3

    https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/95-carter-page-fisa-documents-foia-release/full/optimized.pdf

    Date
    November 27, 2020
    Type of Case
    Civil Rights 29:1983
    The Court the Case was filed in

    USDC of the District Court, District of Columbia

    County/City:
    Washington DC
    Plaintiff

    CARTER PAGE

    Comments

    COMPLAINT
    1. On November 10, 2020, Defendant Andrew McCabe testified in front of the Senate
    Judiciary Hearing that “any material misrepresentation or error in a FISA application is
    unacceptable. Period. The FBI should be held to the standard of scrupulous accuracy that the
    [FISA] court demands.” When pushed to explain “Who is responsible for ruining Mr. Carter
    Page’s life?” McCabe finally responded, “We are all responsible for the work that went into that
    FISA.” This lawsuit seeks that accountability and damages against the individuals and agencies
    who wronged Plaintiff, Carter W. Page (“Dr. Page”).
    2. Specifically, Dr. Page seeks relief herein for Defendants’ multiple violations of his
    Constitutional and other legal rights in connection with unlawful surveillance and investigation of
    him by the United States Government. Dr. Page was targeted because of his lawful association
    with the 2016 Presidential campaign of Donald Trump. Dr. Page is entitled to relief for
    Defendants’ unjustified and illegal actions (including violations of federal criminal law), which
    violated federal statutes enacted to prevent unlawful spying on United States persons, as well as
    the Constitution.

    3. The complained of misconduct occurred in connection with the submission of four
    false and misleading warrant applications to engage in electronic surveillance of Dr. Page,
    ostensibly pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”). Four separate Article
    III judges unwittingly approved the false applications, submitted in October 2016, January 2017,
    April 2017, and June 2017, thereby unlawfully resulting in spying on Dr. Page. As has now been
    admitted by (i) the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), (and (ii) the Federal Bureau of
    Investigation (“FBI”), and/or has been acknowledged by (iii) the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
    Court (“FISC”), the four separate applications for FISA warrants and renewals (collectively, the
    “FISA Warrants”1
    ) to surveil Dr. Page were submitted despite there being no probable cause to
    suspect that Dr. Page was acting as a Foreign Agent of Russia. Consequently, the Defendants’
    unlawful actions allowed them to illegally spy (domestically and internationally) on Dr. Page, a
    patriotic American citizen.
    4. The Defendants’ conduct, which began not later than August 2016, and continued
    through at least September 2017, constituted a fraud on the FISC and violated the Constitutional
    and other rights of Dr. Page.
    I. OVERVIEW OF THE VIOLATIONS
    5. On July 31, 2016, the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation named
    Operation Crossfire Hurricane, putatively concerning the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA),
    to determine whether “individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign are witting of and/or
    coordinating activities with the Government of Russia.” Soon thereafter, Dr. Page and three other
    individuals with whom he had little or no relationship were targeted by the FBI in the Crossfire
    Hurricane investigation.
    6. The FBI investigation soon devolved into an effort to obtain from the FISC a FISA
    warrant authorizing spying and electronic surveillance on Dr. Page.
    7. The FBI did not have probable cause to lawfully obtain a FISA warrant. Instead,
    the FBI used documents furnished by Christopher Steele, a Confidential Human Source (“CHS”).
    As the Crossfire Hurricane team knew, CHS Steele had been paid by the Democratic Party and/or
    the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign to perform “political opposition research” and dig up
    dirt on a connection between the Trump campaign and Russia in order to divert attention from the
    investigation of Clinton’s email practices while she was Secretary of State.
    8. In accordance with core principles of the U.S. Constitution, reinforced by the
    nation’s legal and cultural aversion to spying on its citizens, Congress and the executive branch
    have enacted rigorous requirements that must be met before electronic surveillance of a U.S.
    citizen is legally permitted. To surveil an American citizen, the FISA requires that there be
    probable cause that the target is an “agent of a foreign power” who is “knowingly engag[ing]…in
    clandestine intelligence activities.” In short, to legitimately obtain a FISA warrant against Dr.
    Page, the FBI had to demonstrate that he was a Russian agent who was knowingly engaging in
    intelligence activities on behalf of Russia.
    9. On August 17, 2016, shortly after the inception of the Crossfire Hurricane
    investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), provided information regarding Dr. Page
    to members of the Crossfire Hurricane team. This information established that Dr. Page had been
    a CIA “operational contact” from 2008 – 2013 (and had similar interactions with the FBI).
    Dr. Page had assisted the CIA in combatting intelligence-related activities pursued by Russia and
    other foreign countries against the United States’ interests. Further, the CIA’s employee had given
    a positive assessment of Dr. Page’s candor. Further, on September 7, 2016, the CIA sent an
    investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Assistant Director of
    Counterintelligence Peter Strzok advising them that Hillary Clinton had approved a plan
    concerning U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S.
    elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server. (Letter of
    Director of National Intelligence, dated September 29, 2020.)
    10. During this same investigative phase, the FBI used a second CHS to surreptitiously
    ask Dr. Page about his activities. In this monitored conversation, Dr. Page denied that he either:
    (i) knew anything about improper or unlawful communications or activities between Russian and
    American citizens, or (ii) had engaged in any improper—much less illegal—activity with any
    individual that was harmful to the interests of the United States. This conversation was recorded
    without Dr. Page’s knowledge and was provided to the FBI.
    11. On September 19, 2016, as referenced above, the FBI received information
    regarding Dr. Page from CHS Steele. In particular, two documents, prepared by CHS Steele,
    falsely alleged unlawful communications and activities involving Dr. Page and two Russians with
    close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The FBI “focused on” these two documents from
    Steele to base its claim that there was probable cause to obtain a FISA warrant against Dr. Page.
    12. On September 23, 2016, an article was published in YAHOO! NEWS alleging
    meetings between Dr. Page and the same two Russian individuals. The FBI treated this article as
    corroboration for CHS Steele’s claims when, in fact, Steele was also the source for the Yahoo
    article. Further, on September 25, 2016, Dr. Page sent a letter to then-FBI Director Comey in
    which he categorically denied that he had any such communications with the Russian individuals
    and documented his previous cooperation with the CIA and the FBI to combat Russian spying.
    These false allegations against Dr. Page made by CHS Steele were not investigated by the FBI in
    accordance with its own manuals and procedures. For the FBI to disregard its procedures was
    particularly egregious in this case because the FBI knew that CHS Steele: (a) was being paid to
    provide political “opposition research” on this topic; (b) was essentially the exclusive source of
    information supporting probable cause for the FISA warrant applications, and (c) the CIA had
    warned the FBI of a potential political scheme involving false reporting of collaboration between
    the Trump campaign and Russians.
    13. The more fundamental problem was that the FBI was so intent on obtaining a FISA
    warrant to enable it to spy on the Trump campaign that it did not fully and accurately disclose to
    the FISC the evidence it had obtained as to whether Dr. Page was a Russian agent. To persuade
    the FISC that there was probable cause to believe that Dr. Page was a Russian agent, the
    Defendants provided false or misleading information to the FISC.
    14. The FBI did not advise the FISC that Page had been for many years an “operational
    contact” of the CIA. The FBI did not advise the FISC that CHS Steele had been paid by the
    Democrat party and/or the Clinton campaign to provide opposition research on Donald Trump.
    The FBI did not advise the FISC that Steele’s source (“Primary Sub-source") of information
    against Dr. Page had himself been investigated for attempting to recruit Americans to help spy for
    Russia. The FBI did not advise the FISC that Steele’s Primary Sub-source contradicted critical
    information that Steele attributed to him. Instead, the FBI represented to the FISC that the Primary
    Sub-source was “credible,” without disclosing to the FISC that what the Primary Sub-Source had
    “credibly” reported to the FBI was that the information Steele attributed to him was inaccurate and
    misleading.
    15. Ultimately an FBI attorney altered an email from the CIA in order to falsely deny
    that Dr. Page had been a CIA source serving for many years as an operational contact.
    16. In reality, there was no “probable cause” to support surveillance of Dr. Page. If FBI
    procedures had been followed and an honest and thorough investigation conducted, and if the FBI
    had fully and accurately reported what it knew, the FISA warrants against Dr. Page would neither
    have been sought nor issued.
    17. The individual Defendants fabricated or intentionally disregarded critical evidence,
    and misled the FISC, in order to obtain the FISA warrants. This case is about holding accountable
    the entities and individuals who are responsible for the most egregious violation and abuse of the
    FISA statute since it was enacted over forty years ago.

    to read more: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.224507/gov.uscourts.dcd.224507.1.0.pdf

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    Virginia Judiciary Treason "OK" with JIRC Verified listing

    • JIRC Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission For Acts & Actions of SCV Chief Justices Bernard Goodwyn, Donald Lemons, Cynthia Kinser "Fixer" Judges in Richmond, City of Alexandria, Fairfax, Orange, Culpeper & Virginia Beach Virginia
    • Divorce, Constitutional, Civil Rights, "Fake" illegal Foreclosure, unlawful arrest & assaualt by a Sheriff,
    • Chief Justice Bernard Goodwyn, Chief Justice Donald Lemmons Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser

    SCOTUS Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation into USDC of District of Columbia for Political & Religions BIAS by Judges et al Verified listing

    • The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • No. 23-7758
    • Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation of Political & Religious bias of the Judges
    • John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, ... Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, ... Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, ... Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, ... Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, ... Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, ... Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955. He married Jane Sullivan in 1996 and they have two children - Josephine and Jack. He received an A.B. from Harvard College in 1976 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1979. He served as a law clerk for Judge Henry J. Friendly of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1979–1980, and as a law clerk for then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1980 Term. He served as a Special Assistant to the Attorney General of the United States from 1981–1982, Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan, White House Counsel’s Office from 1982–1986, and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General from 1989–1993. From 1986–1989 and 1993–2003, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. He served as a Judge on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2003–2005. Nominated as Chief Justice of the United States by President George W. Bush, he assumed that office on September 29, 2005. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, was born in the Pinpoint community near Savannah, Georgia on June 23, 1948. He attended Conception Seminary from 1967-1968 and received an A.B., cum laude, from College of the Holy Cross in 1971 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1974. He was admitted to law practice in Missouri in 1974, and served as an Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, 1974-1977; an attorney with the Monsanto Company, 1977-1979; and Legislative Assistant to Senator John Danforth, 1979-1981. From 1981–1982 he served as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education, and as Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1982-1990. From 1990–1991, he served as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court and he took his seat October 23, 1991. He married Virginia Lamp on May 30, 1987 and has one child, Jamal Adeen by a previous marriage. Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, was born in Trenton, New Jersey, on April 1, 1950. He married Martha-Ann Bomgardner in 1985, and has two children - Philip and Laura. He served as a law clerk for Leonard I. Garth of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1976–1977. He served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977–1981, as Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981–1985, as Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985–1987, and as U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1987–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1990. President George W. Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat January 31, 2006. Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and a member of Phi Beta Kappa and receiving the Pyne Prize, the highest academic honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. In 1997, she was nominated by President Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where she served from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009. Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960. She received an A.B. from Princeton in 1981, an M. Phil. from Oxford in 1983, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1986. She clerked for Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1986-1987 and for Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1987 Term. After briefly practicing law at a Washington, D.C. law firm, she became a law professor, first at the University of Chicago Law School and later at Harvard Law School. She also served for four years in the Clinton Administration, as Associate Counsel to the President and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. Between 2003 and 2009, she served as the Dean of Harvard Law School. In 2009, President Obama nominated her as the Solicitor General of the United States. A year later, the President nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 10, 2010. She took her seat on August 7, 2010. Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, was born in Denver, Colorado, August 29, 1967. He and his wife Louise have two daughters. He received a B.A. from Columbia University, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and a D.Phil. from Oxford University. He served as a law clerk to Judge David B. Sentelle of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and as a law clerk to Justice Byron White and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the Supreme Court of the United States. From 1995–2005, he was in private practice, and from 2005–2006 he was Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in 2006. He served on the Standing Committee on Rules for Practice and Procedure of the U.S. Judicial Conference, and as chairman of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure. He taught at the University of Colorado Law School. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on April 10, 2017. Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on February 12, 1965. He married Ashley Estes in 2004, and they have two daughters - Margaret and Liza. He received a B.A. from Yale College in 1987 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1990. He served as a law clerk for Judge Walter Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1990-1991, for Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 1991-1992, and for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1993 Term. In 1992-1993, he was an attorney in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. From 1994 to 1997 and for a period in 1998, he was Associate Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel. He was a partner at a Washington, D.C., law firm from 1997 to 1998 and again from 1999 to 2001. From 2001 to 2003, he was Associate Counsel and then Senior Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush. From 2003 to 2006, he was Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary for President Bush. He was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2006. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on October 6, 2018. Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, on January 28, 1972. She married Jesse M. Barrett in 1999, and they have seven children - Emma, Vivian, Tess, John Peter, Liam, Juliet, and Benjamin. She received a B.A. from Rhodes College in 1994 and a J.D. from Notre Dame Law School in 1997. She served as a law clerk for Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and for Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1998 Term. After two years in private law practice in Washington, D.C., she became a law professor, joining the faculty of Notre Dame Law School in 2002. She was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017. President Donald J. Trump nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat on October 27, 2020. Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on September 14, 1970. She married Patrick Jackson in 1996, and they have two daughters. She received an A.B., magna cum laude, from Harvard-Radcliffe College in 1992, and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1996. She served as a law clerk for Judge Patti B. Saris of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts from 1996 to 1997, Judge Bruce M. Selya of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1999 Term. After three years in private practice, she worked as an attorney at the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2003 to 2005. From 2005 to 2007, she served as an assistant federal public defender in Washington, D.C., and from 2007 to 2010, she was in private practice. She served as a Vice Chair and Commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2010 to 2014. In 2012, President Barack Obama nominated her to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where she served from 2013 to 2021. She was appointed to the Defender Services Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States in 2017, and the Supreme Court Fellows Commission in 2019. President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2021 and then nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 2022. She took her seat on June 30, 2022. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Sacramento, California, July 23, 1936. He married Mary Davis and has three children. He received his B.A. from Stanford University and the London School of Economics, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He was in private practice in San Francisco, California from 1961–1963, as well as in Sacramento, California from 1963–1975. From 1965 to 1988, he was a Professor of Constitutional Law at the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific. He has served in numerous positions during his career, including a member of the California Army National Guard in 1961, the board of the Federal Judicial Center from 1987–1988, and two committees of the Judicial Conference of the United States: the Advisory Panel on Financial Disclosure Reports and Judicial Activities, subsequently renamed the Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct, from 1979–1987, and the Committee on Pacific Territories from 1979–1990, which he chaired from 1982–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1975. President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988. Justice Kennedy retired from the Supreme Court on July 31, 2018. David Hackett Souter, Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, September 17, 1939. He graduated from Harvard College, from which he received his A.B. After two years as a Rhodes Scholar at Magdalen College, Oxford, he received an A.B. in Jurisprudence from Oxford University and an M.A. in 1963. After receiving an LL.B. from Harvard Law School, he was an associate at Orr and Reno in Concord, New Hampshire from 1966 to 1968, when he became an Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1971, he became Deputy Attorney General and in 1976, Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1978, he was named an Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire, and was appointed to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire as an Associate Justice in 1983. He became a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on May 25, 1990. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990. Justice Souter retired from the Supreme Court on June 29, 2009. Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in San Francisco, California, August 15, 1938. He married Joanna Hare in 1967, and has three children - Chloe, Nell, and Michael. He received an A.B. from Stanford University, a B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford, and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He served as a law clerk to Justice Arthur Goldberg of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1964 Term, as a Special Assistant to the Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Antitrust, 1965–1967, as an Assistant Special Prosecutor of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 1973, as Special Counsel of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, 1974–1975, and as Chief Counsel of the committee, 1979–1980. He was an Assistant Professor, Professor of Law, and Lecturer at Harvard Law School, 1967–1994, a Professor at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government, 1977–1980, and a Visiting Professor at the College of Law, Sydney, Australia and at the University of Rome. From 1980–1990, he served as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and as its Chief Judge, 1990–1994. He also served as a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, 1990–1994, and of the United States Sentencing Commission, 1985–1989. President Clinton nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat August 3, 1994. Justice Breyer retired from the Supreme Court on June 30, 2022
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link