Sign in or Register
Add Case
    • Explore
      arrow_drop_down
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      arrow_drop_down
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case

    Parler LLC v. Amazon Web Services Inc FREEDOM OF SPEECH at risk / Anti-Trust

    • Date
      January 12, 2021
    • City/County
      Seattle, Washington
    • Type of Case
      Anti-Trust / Freedom of Speech
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Parler LLC v. Amazon Web Services Inc FREEDOM OF SPEECH at risk / Anti-Trust

    Date
    January 12, 2021
    State or Country
    Washington
    County/City:
    Seattle, Washington
    The Court the Case was filed in

    United District Court of the District Court, W.D. Washington

    Type of Case
    Anti-Trust / Freedom of Speech
    Case Number

    2:21-cv-00031

    Judges

    Barbara Jacobs Rothstein

    Plaintiff

    Parler LLC

    Defendant

    Amazon Web Services Inc

    Plaintiff Attorney

    David J Groesbeck
    (509) 747-2800
    David J Groesbeck Ps
    621 W Mallon Ave
    Ste 507
    Spokane, WA 99201

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Defendant Attorney

    Ambika K Doran
    (206) 757-8030
    Fax: (206) 757-7700
    Davis Wright Tremaine (Sea)
    920 Fifth Ave.
    Ste 3300
    Seattle, WA 98104-1610

    ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Comments

    NATURE OF THE ACTION

    1. This is a civil action for injunctive relief, including a temporary
    restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief, and damages. Last Month,
    Defendant Amazon Web Services, Inc. (“AWS”) and the popular social media
    platform Twitter signed a multi-year deal so that AWS could support the daily
    delivery of millions of tweets. AWS currently provides that same service to Parler,
    a conservative microblogging alternative and competitor to Twitter.

    2. When Twitter announced two evenings ago that it was permanently
    banning President Trump from its platform, conservative users began to flee
    Twitter en masse for Parler. The exodus was so large that the next day, yesterday,
    Parler became the number one free app downloaded from Apple’s App Store.

    3. Yet last evening, AWS announced that it would suspend Parler’s
    account effective Sunday, January 10th, at 11:59 PM PST. And it stated the reason
    for the suspension was that AWS was not confident Parler could properly police its
    platform regarding content that encourages or incites violence against others.
    However, Friday night one of the top trending tweets on Twitter was “Hang Mike
    Pence.” But AWS has no plans nor has it made any threats to suspend Twitter’s
    account.

    4. AWS’s decision to effectively terminate Parler’s account is apparently
    motivated by political animus. It is also apparently designed to reduce competition
    in the microblogging services market to the benefit of Twitter.

    5. Thus, AWS is violating Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act in
    combination with Defendant Twitter. AWS is also breaching it contract with
    Parler, which requires AWS to provide Parler with a thirty-day notice before
    terminating service, rather than the less than thirty-hour notice AWS actually
    provided. Finally, AWS is committing intentional interference with prospective
    economic advantage given the millions of users expected to sign up in the near
    future.

    6. This emergency suit seeks a Temporary Restraining Order against
    Defendant Amazon Web Services to prevent it from shutting down Parler’s account
    at the end of today. Doing so is the equivalent of pulling the plug on a hospital
    patient on life support. It will kill Parler’s business—at the very time it is set to
    skyrocket.

    Social Networks
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Other
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Other
    • YouTube
    • YouTube
    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664.1.0_1.pdf

    Document Link 2

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664.1.1.pdf

    Document Link 3

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664.1.2.pdf

    Document Link 4

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664.11.0.pdf

    Document Link 5

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664/gov.uscourts.wawd.294664.2.0_2.pdf

    mood_bad
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    WHISTLEBLOWER LANDMARK CASE Bellevue WA School District PERJURY/FRAUD UPON THE COURT+FELONIES by BSD 405 SINCE 2008 They've wasted over a MILLION TAX DOLLARS obstructing JUSTICE https://www.linkedin.com/in/keith-d-80a164198

    • Seattle Federal JUDGE caught taking $50,000 BRIBE to ILLEGALLY DENY ME DUE PROCESS/JURY TRIAL - Western District Court of Washington https://www.linkedin.com/in/keith-d-80a164198
    • KEITH DOUGHERTY V. BELLEVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT, No. 12-35580 (9th Cir. 2014) https://www.linkedin.com/in/keith-d-80a164198
    • RETALIATION, DISCRIMINATION, UNION RIGHTS, FRAUD UPON THE COURT, PUBLIC RECORDS EVIDENCE DESTRUCTION, FEDERAL JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT $50,000 BRIBE
    • https://www.linkedin.com/in/keith-d-80a164198 BIAS all OVER THIS CASE and $50,000 BRIBE to SEATTLE WA FEDERAL JUDGE, demoted in 2016. Judge Richard Jones got the case and immediately gave it to Judge James Robart #DeckWasStacked When I asked for an IMPARTIAL and UNBIASED JUDGE, Chief Justice Marsha Pechman denied my request TWICE and also refused me a FEDERAL MAGISTRATE. Judge Robart illegally dismissed my case with NO DISCOVERY, NO MEETING with OPPOSING COUNSEL (her husband works for King County Prosecutor), and NO ORAL ARGUMENTS/JURY TRIAL. The SAME DAY Mary Neel WA Court of Appeals illegally/criminally BARRED the WA Supreme Court from hearing my prima facie whistleblower retaliation case. JUDGES failed to recognize it's a FELONY for SCHOOL COUNSEL to LIE to STATE/FEDERAL JUDGES and INVESTIGATORS. RICARDO CRUZ caused $40 MILLION in KING COUNTY HR FRAUD ALONE before ILLEGALLY acting as hr director/general counsel/affirmative action/labor relations. YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN HIM SQUIRM and HIS EYES GOT HUGE when I told him I also have family and friends at DOJ/FBI. CRUZ's wife is KATHRYN WARMS, now RETIRED U.S. ATTORNEY. I firmly believe she played a big role in this ONGOING OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE. Just ask their nephew, GABE CRUZ, who apologized for their illegal actions against me and my family. GABE is a very good man and also a WHISTLEBLOWER.
    Donate with Paypal
    Go Fund Me
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    person
    Sign in
    personDon't have an account?
    lockForgot password?
    person
    Create an account

    IMPORTANT NOTICE: After registering your account, please check your email and click on the confirmation, then return to the website and log back in with the username and password you received in your email.

    PRIVACY POLICY: Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.

    Already Registered?

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link