Sign in or Register
Add Case
    • Explore
      arrow_drop_down
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      arrow_drop_down
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case

    Petition for Certiorari Isidoro Rodriguez v. Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, SCOTUS No 20-25

    • Date
      July 13, 2020
    • City/County
      District of Columbia
    • Type of Case
      Civil Action for Issuance of a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    Petition for Certiorari Isidoro Rodriguez v. Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, SCOTUS No 20-25

    Date
    July 13, 2020
    State or Country
    District of Columbia
    County/City:
    District of Columbia
    The Court the Case was filed in

    United States Supreme Court

    Type of Case
    Civil Action for Issuance of a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
    Case Number

    SCOTUS 02-25, Petition is filed to secure compliance by the courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia with the mandates of the Void Ab Initio Order Doctrine, the 1st, 5th, 7th, and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as compliance with the limitation on the courts under the Constitution of Virginia (“Const. VA”) and Virginia Code (“VA Code”) (see https://t.co/sLv7pz3zD5). In the context, because it is in “the federal government’s interest to have effective and fair state courts,” the request for a Statement of Interest is to support the stopping of the Commonwealth of Virginia’s systemic denial of access to an impartial court and trial by a jury by the granting of immunity to for the government’s undertakings outside of legal authority in violation of the Void Ab Initio Order Doctrine, the separation of power under Art. VI §§ 1, 5, and 7 of the Constitution of Virginia (VA Const.”), and the prohibitions under VA Code § 54-1-3915 & 54.1 3935 (See http://www.isidororodriguez.com).

    Judges

    Supreme Court of the United States

    Plaintiff

    Isidoro Rodriguez

    Defendant

    Virginia State Bar Disciplianry Board

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Isidoro Rodriguez

    Defendant Attorney

    Hon. Mark Herring
    Attorney General
    for the Commonwealth of Virginia
    202 North 9th Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219

    Ms. Erin R. McNeill, Esq.
    Assistant Attorney General for the
    Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board
    The Office of the Attorney General
    202 North 9th Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219

    Comments

    LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY RELATED PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS WHICH HAVE SYSTEMICALLY DENIED ACCESS TO AN IMPARTIAL COURT TO RECIPROCALLY ENFORCE THE VSBDB VOID AD INITIO ORDER.

    1. Isidoro Rodriguez v. General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., S. Ct. VA No. 190579 (September 2, 2019); Fairfax County Circuit Court Case No. 2018-16227 (February 12, 2019).

    2. Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., US Dist. Ct. ED VA 12-cv-663-JAB (April 12, 2013), aff’d 4th Cir USCA No 13-1638 (Nov. 2013), cert. denied 2014.

    3. In the matter of Isidoro Rodriguez, US Sup. Ct. Docket No. D-02466 (May 26, 2010), cert. denied.

    4. Isidoro and Irene Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, US Tax Court Docket No. 10691-09, cert. denied; and, Isidoro Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, US Tax Court Docket No. 11855-12, cert. denied 2014.

    5. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Jack Harbeston, and Eric Holder et al., US Dist. Ct. WD Wash. No. 11-cv-1601 (JCC).

    6. Irene Rodriguez and Isidoro Rodriguez v. Douglas Shulman, et al., D.C. Cir. Ct. No. 11-cv-1183(JEB).

    7. In re Isidoro Rodriguez, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, ML No. 2307 (December 14, 2011).

    8. Isidoro Rodriguez v. US Tax Court, D.C. Cir. No. 10-1016, cert. denied, US Sup. Ct. No. 10-1066 (Closed, March 21, 2011).

    9. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Virginia Employment Commission, US Sup Ct. Docket No. 09-954 (Cert. Denied March 19, 2010), S. Ct. VA Record No. 092494, and the Court of Appeals of Virginia, Record No. 0291-09-4.

    10. Isidoro Rodriguez v. US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, (D.C. Cir. No. 08-7134) cert. denied No. 09-237 (November 2, 2009).

    11. In the matter of Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., (4th Cir. No. 06-9518), cert. denied No. 08-942 (March 20, 2009), injunction denied (March 24, 2009).

    12. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Standing Committee on Attorney Discipline, (3rd Cir. No 08-8037), cert. denied No. 08-1121 (Closed, May 18, 2009).

    13. Isidoro Rodriguez v. US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, (2nd Cir. No 08-90089); cert. denied No. 08-942 (Closed, July 31, 2009).

    14. Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq. v. Editor-in-Chief, Legal Times, et al., DC Dist. Ct. No 07-cv-0975 (PF), DC Ct App. N. 07-5334, injunction denied SC Ct. No. 07A601, cert. denied US Sup Ct. 08-411(Closed, 2008).

    15. In re Isidoro Rodriguez, U.S. Dist. Ct. for the E. D. VA, Docket No. 1:08-mc-00022, May 28, 2008.

    16. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al., (S. Ct. No. 07-419, November 2, 2007); and Isidoro Rodriguez v. Supreme Court of Virginia, (Va. Sup. Ct No. 07-0283), cert denied Nos. 07-A142 and 07A370 (2007).

    17. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Devis and VA State Bar, VA Sup Ct. No. 06052, cert. denied US Sup Ct. Nos. 06A619/06-875 (Closed, October 2006).

    18. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Pereira, 163 F. Appx. 227 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 954 (2006).

    19. Isidoro Rodriguez v. Guy Vander Jagt, et al., Sup. Ct. of Va. No 040941/040942, cert. denied, No. 04-867 (Feb. 28, 2005).

    20. Isidoro Rodriguez v. HFP Inc., et al., 77 F. Appx. 663 (4th Cir. 2003), cert. denied 541 U.S. 903 (2004).

    21. Isidoro Rodriguez-Hazbun v. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children et al, D.C. No. 03-120(RWR); D.C. Cir. No. 03-5092, cert. denied USSC No. 03-301 (2006).

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://isidororodriguez.com/2020/07/13/filed-july-13-2020-in-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-isidoro-rodriguez-v-virginia-state-bar-disciplinary-board-on-petition-for-a-writ-of-certiorari-to-the-supreme-court-of-the-commonwealt/

    Contact Info

    Isidoro Rodriguez
    *Former Member of the SCOTUS Bar
    2671 Avenir Place, Apt 2227
    Vienna, Virginia 22180

    Rodriguez and Rodriguez
    World Trade Center
    Calle 76 No. 54-11, Suite 313
    Barranquilla, Colombia
    Virginia Mobile: 1.571.477.5350
    CO Mobile: 57.300.658.7220

    mood_bad
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, AND STATE OF WISCONSIN, Defendants

    • Supreme Court of the United States of America
    • No. 22O155
    • Voter: The State of Texas (“Plaintiff State”) hereby moves, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 21, for expedited consideration of the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint, filed today, in an original action on the administration of the 2020 presidential election by defendants Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. (collectively, “Defendant States”). The relevant statutory deadlines for the defendants’ action based on unconstitutional election results are imminent: (a) December 8 is the safe harbor for certifying presidential electors, 3 U.S.C. § 5; (b) the electoral college votes on December 14, 3 U.S.C. § 7; and (c) the House of Representatives counts votes on January 6, 3 U.S.C. § 15. Absent some form of relief, the defendants will appoint electors based on unconstitutional and deeply uncertain election results, and the House will count those votes on January 6, tainting the election and the future of free elections
    • Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. ... Clarence Thomas. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen G. Breyer. Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. Sonia Sotomayor. Elena Kagan

    USDC of District of Columbia Case No. 1:20-cv-02570 Judge Beryl Howell who is a party to Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman's "GANG"

    • U.S. District of Court of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) The Civil Rights Court of the United States of America
    • 1:20-cv-02570- BAH Judge Beryl Howell Moved Case from the City of Alexandria Circuit Court Case No. Case No. CL 1900-2675
    • Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights,
    • Judge Beryl Howell City of Alexandria Judge H. Thomas Padrick Ret. with the Retired Judge Dispute Resolution Services LLC

    Washington DC: Michigan Welfare Rights Org. v. Donald J. Trump

    • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    • 1:20-cv-03388
    • Voter Fraud, Voter Integrity Cause: 42:1973 Voting Rights Act Nature of Suit: 441 Voting
    • Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
    Donate with Paypal
    Go Fund Me
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    person
    Sign in
    personDon't have an account?
    lockForgot password?
    person
    Create an account

    IMPORTANT NOTICE: After registering your account, please check your email and click on the confirmation, then return to the website and log back in with the username and password you received in your email.

    PRIVACY POLICY: Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.

    Already Registered?

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link