JudicialPedia Logo
    • What’s In Your Toolbox?
      • ADA Advocate
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • Judicial Complaint against a Judge
      • Professional Code of Ethics
      • Resources
      • The Constitution
      • The Grand Jury
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      • Contact Us
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    Add Case / Complaint
    Sign in or Register
    Add Case / Complaint

    VSB - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF EDWIN GRIER FERGUSON Verified listing

    • Date
      November 19, 2019
    • City/County
      Suffolk, Virginia
    • Type of Case
      Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Trusts, Commingling of Funds and Excessive Fees Charged
    • Case Details
    • prev
    • next
    • Bookmark
    • Copy link
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    VSB - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF EDWIN GRIER FERGUSON

    Case Number

    Virginia State Bar VSB Docket No. 17-010-109281

    State or Country
    Virginia
    Judges

    Virginia State Bar District Committee Members are not judges.

    The VSB 1st District Committee Members were:

    Veronica E. Meade, Esq. Chair; James E. Short, Esq.; and
    Walter P. Nullet, lay member

    Defendant

    E. Grier Ferguson, Esquire
    FERGUSON RAWLS & RAINES, PC
    332 W. Constance Rd.
    Suffolk, VA 23434

    https://frrlaw.com/our_attorneys/e-grier-ferguson

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Virginia State Bar Asst. Bar Counsel Paulo E. Franco, Jr.
    Virginia State Bar
    1111 East Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Arbitrators

    N/A

    Judges Comments

    THERE WERE NO JUDGES INVOLVED.

    ONLY 2 LAWYERS AND ONE LAW PERSON SERVED ON THE SUBCOMMITTEE THAT RULED ON THIS EGREGIOUS MATTER.

    FINDINGS OF THE 1ST DISTRICT COMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

    I. FINDINGS OF FACT

    1. At all times relevant, Respondent has been licensed to practice law in the
    Commonwealth of Virginia and has been active and in good standing.
    2. The Respondent was admitted to the Bar of the Commonwealth of Virginia on
    May 18, 1977.
    3. Respondent first represented the Complainant in a real estate closing sometime
    back in 1993.
    4. From that point forward, Complainant retained Respondent to handle of all of his
    business and financial dealings involving real estate.
    5. During the course of his representation of the Complainant, Respondent borrowed
    money from the Complainant.
    6. In his answer to the Complaint, Respondent did not deny that he had entered into
    the loans with Complainant and did not deny that some may not have been, repaid in full.
    7. Respondent further did not deny that prior into entering into the loans with the
    Complainant that he did not advise the Complainant in accordance with Rule 1.8 of the Rules of
    the Supreme Court of Virginia.
    8. During the time that Respondent was providing legal advice and engaging in
    financial transactions with the. Complainant, he was the Trustee of certain trusts which were
    established in 1992 and 1998. Each of these trusts were irrevocable.
    9. During the time that Respondent was providing legal advice and engaging in
    financial transactions with the Complainant, Respondent made at least 17 loans to the
    Complainant using trust funds ("Loans").
    10. Sixteen of the Loans did not have any documentation such as promissory notes or
    other evidence of the debt owed by Complainant to the trusts. The loans were all repaid.
    11. Respondent never advised the trust settlor or the beneficiaries of the trusts that he
    was loaning money from those trusts to the Complainant.
    12. Respondent charged Complainant and agreed to an interest rate often percent on
    the Loans that the trusts made to Complainant.
    13. Respondent kept five percent of the repaid interests for himself as a fee, in
    addition to the fees he charged the trusts for services rendered as Trustee.
    14. . The settlor became aware of the Loans to Complainant in 2013 and 2014 when he
    reviewed accountings that the Respondent had provided.
    15. The settlor, after retaining counsel, determined that Respondent had paid himself
    fees that were not reasonable or justified by keeping a portion of the earned interest on the Loans
    in addition to charging the trusts administration fees for acting as Trustee.
    16. Respondent and the settlor met to discuss the matters uncovered, and both agreed
    that Respondent would pay back $500,000.00 to the trust; the settlor did not join in this
    complaint.
    17. Respondent executed a promissory note on January 1, 2015 in the amount of
    $500,000.00 plus interest at 5% payable in 120 monthly installments to the 1998 trust
    ("Promissory Note").
    18. Respondent had paid back approximately $207,000.00 of the principal owed on
    the Promissory Note.

    II. NATURE OF MISCONDUCT

    Such conduct by Respondent constitutes misconduct in violation of the following
    provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct:

    RULE 1.5 Fees
    (a) A lawyer's fee shall be reasonable. The factors to be considered in determining the
    reasonableness of a fee include the following:
    (1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions
    involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly;
    (2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular
    employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;
    (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
    (4) the amount involved and the results obtained;
    (5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances;
    (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client;
    (7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the
    services; and
    (8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.
    (b) The lawyer's fee shall be adequately explained to the client. When the lawyer has not
    regularly represented the client, the amount, basis or rate of the fee shall be communicated to the
    client, preferably in writing, before or within a reasonable time after commencing the
    representation.
    * * * *

    RULE 1.7 Conflict of Interest: General Rule.
    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the
    representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists
    if:
    (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
    (2) there is significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be
    materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a
    third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.

    * * *

    RULE 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions
    (a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire
    an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:

    (1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and
    reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a
    manner which can be reasonably understood by the client;
    (2) the client is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advice of independent
    counsel in the transaction; and
    (3) the client consents in writing thereto.

    * * *

    RULE 1.15 Safekeeping Property

    (a) Depositing Funds.
    ( 1) All funds received or held by a lawyer or law firm on behalf of a client or a
    third party, or held by a lawyer as a fiduciary, other than reimbursement of advances for
    costs and expenses shall be deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts; all other
    property held on behalf of a client should be placed in a safe deposit box or other place of
    safekeeping as soon as practicable.
    (2) For lawyers or law firms located in Virginia, a lawyer trust account shall be
    maintained only at a financial institution approved by the Virginia State Bar, unless
    otherwise expressly directed in writing by the client for whom the funds are being held.
    (3) No funds belonging to the lawyer or law firm shall be deposited or maintained
    therein except as follows:
    (i) funds reasonably sufficient to pay service or other charges or fees
    imposed by the financial institution or to maintain a required minimum balance to
    avoid the imposition of service fees, provided the funds deposited are no more
    than necessary to do so; or
    (ii) funds in which two or more persons (one of whom may be the lawyer)
    claim an interest shall be held in the trust account until the dispute is resolved and
    there is an accounting and severance of their interests. Any portion finally
    determined to belong to the lawyer or law firm shall be withdrawn promptly from
    the trust account.

    (b) Specific Duties. A lawyer shall:

    (1) promptly notify a client of the receipt of the client's funds, securities, or other
    properties;
    (2) identify and label securities and properties of a client, or those held by a
    lawyer as a fiduciary, promptly upon receipt;
    (3) maintain complete records of all funds, securities, and other properties of a
    client coming into the possession of the lawyer and render appropriate accountings to the
    client regarding them;
    (4) promptly pay or deliver to the client or another as requested by such person
    the funds, securities, or other properties in the possession of the lawyer that such person
    is entitled to receive; and
    (5) not disburse funds or use property of a client or third party with a valid lien or
    assignment without their consent or convert funds or property of a client or third party,
    except as directed by a tribunal.

    III. PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS

    Accordingly, having approved the agreed disposition, it is the decision of the
    Subcommittee to impose a PUBLIC Reprimand with Terms. The terms are:
    1. Respondent shall have all of his trust accounts kept in accordance with Rule 1.15
    and other fiduciary accounts audited twice a year, at his expense, by a Certified Public
    Accountant authorized to conduct such audits in Virginia. The audits shall be performed for a
    two year period beginning on the date of the issuance of the disposition imposing the Public
    Reprimand with Terms set forth herein.
    2. The Certified Public Accountant shall submit a written report to the Bar Counsel
    of the biannual audits certifying that all of Respondent's trust and fiduciary accounts are in
    compliance with Rule 1.15 of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Such reports shall be
    submitted to bar counsel with 30 days of the expiration of every six-month period.
    3. Within 60 days of the date of the issuance of the disposition imposing Public
    Reprimand with terms, Respondent shall provide to Bar Counsel a written status report
    indicating the status of the Promissory Note Respondent executed to pay back the Trust monies
    he overcharged in fees. If the Promissory Note is not current, Respondent shall bring the Note
    current within 30 days of his report to Bar Counsel and provide a further written certification
    attesting to the fact that the has brought the Promissory Note Current.
    4. Respondent shall thereafter continue to repay the Promissory Note in full as a
    condition of this sanction of Public Reprimand with Terms.
    5. If the Respondent does not continue to keep the Promissory Note current, then he
    shall be in breach of the terms of this Public Reprimand with Terms.
    If any of the terms are not met by the time specified, pursuant to Part 6, § IV, ,r 13-15.F
    of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the District Committee shall hold a hearing and
    Respondent shall be required to show cause why a Certification for Sanction Determination
    should not be imposed. Any proceeding initiated due to failure to comply with terms will be
    considered a new matter, and an administrative fee and costs will be assessed.
    Pursuant to Part 6, §IV,, 13-9.E. of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the
    Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall assess costs.

    FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE
    OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
    Veronica E. Meade, Esq.
    Subcommittee Chair

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj2iqLYvLnqAhX1l3IEHZGZDV8QFjAAegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vsb.org%2Fdocs%2FFerguson-112019.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2XoZkubzhXLejq5mGbwU0b

    Document Link 2

    https://frrlaw.com/our_attorneys/e-grier-ferguson

    Document Link 3

    https://frrlaw.com/

    Date
    November 19, 2019
    Type of Case
    Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Trusts, Commingling of Funds and Excessive Fees Charged
    The Court the Case was filed in

    Virginia State Bar First District Committee

    County/City:
    Suffolk, Virginia
    Clerk of Court

    THERE WAS NO COURT.

    ALL PROCEEDINGS WERE WITHING THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR.

    Davida D. Davis
    Clerk, VSB Disciplinary System
    Virginia State Bar
    1111 East Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Plaintiff

    Unknown

    Defendant Attorney

    Carl A. Eason, Esquire
    Woicott, Rivers & Gates
    200 Bendix Road, Suite 300
    Virginia Beach, VA 23452

    Mediators

    N/A

    Comments

    ONLY A PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS WAS IMPOSED BY THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR.

    BASED ON MULTIPLE BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTIES INVOLVING THE COMMINGLING OF CLIENT FUNDS WITH THE FUNDS OF FERGUSON, RAWLS & RAINES, P.C AND EXCESSIVE FEES INVOLVING AT LEAST FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.0) WHICH WOULD USUALLY RESULT IN A SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF AN ATTORNEY'S RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW IN VIRGINIA.

    PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS ONLY DISCIPLINE & E. GRIER FERGUSON, ESQUIRE, WAS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE PRACTICING LAW AND SERVE AS A FIDUCIARY IN MANY OTHER MATTERS INVOLVING LARGE SUMS OF FUNDS.

    You May Also Be Interested In

    JW Grenadier v. Leon Cooperman, Glenn Messina, OCWEN, Judge Lawyer Donald R. Alexander Verified listing

    • In the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit Leon County, Florida
    • 2024-CA-00634
    • Rico Racketeering, Constitutional Rights, Foreclosure Fraud
    • Judge Angela C. Dempsey

    Virginia Judiciary Treason "OK" with JIRC Verified listing

    • JIRC Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission For Acts & Actions of SCV Chief Justices Bernard Goodwyn, Donald Lemons, Cynthia Kinser "Fixer" Judges in Richmond, City of Alexandria, Fairfax, Orange, Culpeper & Virginia Beach Virginia
    • Divorce, Constitutional, Civil Rights, "Fake" illegal Foreclosure, unlawful arrest & assaualt by a Sheriff,
    • Chief Justice Bernard Goodwyn, Chief Justice Donald Lemmons Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser

    SCOTUS Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation into USDC of District of Columbia for Political & Religions BIAS by Judges et al Verified listing

    • The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
    • No. 23-7758
    • Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation of Political & Religious bias of the Judges
    • John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, ... Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, ... Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, ... Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, ... Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, ... Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, ... Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955. He married Jane Sullivan in 1996 and they have two children - Josephine and Jack. He received an A.B. from Harvard College in 1976 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1979. He served as a law clerk for Judge Henry J. Friendly of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1979–1980, and as a law clerk for then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1980 Term. He served as a Special Assistant to the Attorney General of the United States from 1981–1982, Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan, White House Counsel’s Office from 1982–1986, and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General from 1989–1993. From 1986–1989 and 1993–2003, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. He served as a Judge on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2003–2005. Nominated as Chief Justice of the United States by President George W. Bush, he assumed that office on September 29, 2005. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, was born in the Pinpoint community near Savannah, Georgia on June 23, 1948. He attended Conception Seminary from 1967-1968 and received an A.B., cum laude, from College of the Holy Cross in 1971 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1974. He was admitted to law practice in Missouri in 1974, and served as an Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, 1974-1977; an attorney with the Monsanto Company, 1977-1979; and Legislative Assistant to Senator John Danforth, 1979-1981. From 1981–1982 he served as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education, and as Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1982-1990. From 1990–1991, he served as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court and he took his seat October 23, 1991. He married Virginia Lamp on May 30, 1987 and has one child, Jamal Adeen by a previous marriage. Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, was born in Trenton, New Jersey, on April 1, 1950. He married Martha-Ann Bomgardner in 1985, and has two children - Philip and Laura. He served as a law clerk for Leonard I. Garth of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1976–1977. He served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977–1981, as Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981–1985, as Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985–1987, and as U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1987–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1990. President George W. Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat January 31, 2006. Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and a member of Phi Beta Kappa and receiving the Pyne Prize, the highest academic honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. In 1997, she was nominated by President Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where she served from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009. Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960. She received an A.B. from Princeton in 1981, an M. Phil. from Oxford in 1983, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1986. She clerked for Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1986-1987 and for Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1987 Term. After briefly practicing law at a Washington, D.C. law firm, she became a law professor, first at the University of Chicago Law School and later at Harvard Law School. She also served for four years in the Clinton Administration, as Associate Counsel to the President and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. Between 2003 and 2009, she served as the Dean of Harvard Law School. In 2009, President Obama nominated her as the Solicitor General of the United States. A year later, the President nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 10, 2010. She took her seat on August 7, 2010. Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, was born in Denver, Colorado, August 29, 1967. He and his wife Louise have two daughters. He received a B.A. from Columbia University, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and a D.Phil. from Oxford University. He served as a law clerk to Judge David B. Sentelle of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and as a law clerk to Justice Byron White and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the Supreme Court of the United States. From 1995–2005, he was in private practice, and from 2005–2006 he was Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in 2006. He served on the Standing Committee on Rules for Practice and Procedure of the U.S. Judicial Conference, and as chairman of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure. He taught at the University of Colorado Law School. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on April 10, 2017. Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on February 12, 1965. He married Ashley Estes in 2004, and they have two daughters - Margaret and Liza. He received a B.A. from Yale College in 1987 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1990. He served as a law clerk for Judge Walter Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1990-1991, for Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 1991-1992, and for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1993 Term. In 1992-1993, he was an attorney in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. From 1994 to 1997 and for a period in 1998, he was Associate Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel. He was a partner at a Washington, D.C., law firm from 1997 to 1998 and again from 1999 to 2001. From 2001 to 2003, he was Associate Counsel and then Senior Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush. From 2003 to 2006, he was Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary for President Bush. He was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2006. President Donald J. Trump nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat on October 6, 2018. Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, on January 28, 1972. She married Jesse M. Barrett in 1999, and they have seven children - Emma, Vivian, Tess, John Peter, Liam, Juliet, and Benjamin. She received a B.A. from Rhodes College in 1994 and a J.D. from Notre Dame Law School in 1997. She served as a law clerk for Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and for Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1998 Term. After two years in private law practice in Washington, D.C., she became a law professor, joining the faculty of Notre Dame Law School in 2002. She was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017. President Donald J. Trump nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat on October 27, 2020. Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, was born in Washington, D.C., on September 14, 1970. She married Patrick Jackson in 1996, and they have two daughters. She received an A.B., magna cum laude, from Harvard-Radcliffe College in 1992, and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1996. She served as a law clerk for Judge Patti B. Saris of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts from 1996 to 1997, Judge Bruce M. Selya of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1999 Term. After three years in private practice, she worked as an attorney at the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2003 to 2005. From 2005 to 2007, she served as an assistant federal public defender in Washington, D.C., and from 2007 to 2010, she was in private practice. She served as a Vice Chair and Commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2010 to 2014. In 2012, President Barack Obama nominated her to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where she served from 2013 to 2021. She was appointed to the Defender Services Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States in 2017, and the Supreme Court Fellows Commission in 2019. President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2021 and then nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 2022. She took her seat on June 30, 2022. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Sacramento, California, July 23, 1936. He married Mary Davis and has three children. He received his B.A. from Stanford University and the London School of Economics, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He was in private practice in San Francisco, California from 1961–1963, as well as in Sacramento, California from 1963–1975. From 1965 to 1988, he was a Professor of Constitutional Law at the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific. He has served in numerous positions during his career, including a member of the California Army National Guard in 1961, the board of the Federal Judicial Center from 1987–1988, and two committees of the Judicial Conference of the United States: the Advisory Panel on Financial Disclosure Reports and Judicial Activities, subsequently renamed the Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct, from 1979–1987, and the Committee on Pacific Territories from 1979–1990, which he chaired from 1982–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1975. President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988. Justice Kennedy retired from the Supreme Court on July 31, 2018. David Hackett Souter, Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, September 17, 1939. He graduated from Harvard College, from which he received his A.B. After two years as a Rhodes Scholar at Magdalen College, Oxford, he received an A.B. in Jurisprudence from Oxford University and an M.A. in 1963. After receiving an LL.B. from Harvard Law School, he was an associate at Orr and Reno in Concord, New Hampshire from 1966 to 1968, when he became an Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1971, he became Deputy Attorney General and in 1976, Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1978, he was named an Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire, and was appointed to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire as an Associate Justice in 1983. He became a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on May 25, 1990. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990. Justice Souter retired from the Supreme Court on June 29, 2009. Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer (Retired), Associate Justice, was born in San Francisco, California, August 15, 1938. He married Joanna Hare in 1967, and has three children - Chloe, Nell, and Michael. He received an A.B. from Stanford University, a B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford, and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He served as a law clerk to Justice Arthur Goldberg of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1964 Term, as a Special Assistant to the Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Antitrust, 1965–1967, as an Assistant Special Prosecutor of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 1973, as Special Counsel of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, 1974–1975, and as Chief Counsel of the committee, 1979–1980. He was an Assistant Professor, Professor of Law, and Lecturer at Harvard Law School, 1967–1994, a Professor at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government, 1977–1980, and a Visiting Professor at the College of Law, Sydney, Australia and at the University of Rome. From 1980–1990, he served as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and as its Chief Judge, 1990–1994. He also served as a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, 1990–1994, and of the United States Sentencing Commission, 1985–1989. President Clinton nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat August 3, 1994. Justice Breyer retired from the Supreme Court on June 30, 2022
    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." -Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to ring the bell for Justice!

     

    Judicialpedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which is the Supreme Law of the United States. The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

     

    Judicialpedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment. When you post and submit a case you agree to the following: When this form is submitted, the party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and that relevant information has not been omitted.

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger
    Donate to Judicialpedia
    Add a Case or Complaint
    • Copyright and Trademark Judicialpedia 2020-2023.
    • All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link