Sign in or Register
Add Case
    • Explore
      arrow_drop_down
      • Cash Courts vs. Constitutional Courts
      • The Constitution
    • Resources
    • Browse Cases
    • Support
      arrow_drop_down
      • Donate
      • Partner
      • Thank You
    • Contact Us
    Add Case

    VSB - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF EDWIN GRIER FERGUSON

    • Date
      November 19, 2019
    • City/County
      Suffolk, Virginia
    • Type of Case
      Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Trusts, Commingling of Funds and Excessive Fees Charged
    • Case Details
    • New Page 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Get directions
    • Leave a review
    • Bookmark
    • Share
    • Report
    • prev
    • next
    Title

    VSB - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF EDWIN GRIER FERGUSON

    Date
    November 19, 2019
    State or Country
    Virginia
    County/City:
    Suffolk, Virginia
    The Court the Case was filed in

    Virginia State Bar First District Committee

    Type of Case
    Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Trusts, Commingling of Funds and Excessive Fees Charged
    Case Number

    Virginia State Bar VSB Docket No. 17-010-109281

    Judges

    Virginia State Bar District Committee Members are not judges.

    The VSB 1st District Committee Members were:

    Veronica E. Meade, Esq. Chair; James E. Short, Esq.; and
    Walter P. Nullet, lay member

    Arbitrators

    N/A

    Mediators

    N/A

    Plaintiff

    Unknown

    Defendant

    E. Grier Ferguson, Esquire
    FERGUSON RAWLS & RAINES, PC
    332 W. Constance Rd.
    Suffolk, VA 23434

    https://frrlaw.com/our_attorneys/e-grier-ferguson

    Plaintiff Attorney

    Virginia State Bar Asst. Bar Counsel Paulo E. Franco, Jr.
    Virginia State Bar
    1111 East Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Defendant Attorney

    Carl A. Eason, Esquire
    Woicott, Rivers & Gates
    200 Bendix Road, Suite 300
    Virginia Beach, VA 23452

    Clerk of Court

    THERE WAS NO COURT.

    ALL PROCEEDINGS WERE WITHING THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR.

    Davida D. Davis
    Clerk, VSB Disciplinary System
    Virginia State Bar
    1111 East Main Street, Suite 700
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Judges Comments

    THERE WERE NO JUDGES INVOLVED.

    ONLY 2 LAWYERS AND ONE LAW PERSON SERVED ON THE SUBCOMMITTEE THAT RULED ON THIS EGREGIOUS MATTER.

    FINDINGS OF THE 1ST DISTRICT COMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

    I. FINDINGS OF FACT

    1. At all times relevant, Respondent has been licensed to practice law in the
    Commonwealth of Virginia and has been active and in good standing.
    2. The Respondent was admitted to the Bar of the Commonwealth of Virginia on
    May 18, 1977.
    3. Respondent first represented the Complainant in a real estate closing sometime
    back in 1993.
    4. From that point forward, Complainant retained Respondent to handle of all of his
    business and financial dealings involving real estate.
    5. During the course of his representation of the Complainant, Respondent borrowed
    money from the Complainant.
    6. In his answer to the Complaint, Respondent did not deny that he had entered into
    the loans with Complainant and did not deny that some may not have been, repaid in full.
    7. Respondent further did not deny that prior into entering into the loans with the
    Complainant that he did not advise the Complainant in accordance with Rule 1.8 of the Rules of
    the Supreme Court of Virginia.
    8. During the time that Respondent was providing legal advice and engaging in
    financial transactions with the. Complainant, he was the Trustee of certain trusts which were
    established in 1992 and 1998. Each of these trusts were irrevocable.
    9. During the time that Respondent was providing legal advice and engaging in
    financial transactions with the Complainant, Respondent made at least 17 loans to the
    Complainant using trust funds ("Loans").
    10. Sixteen of the Loans did not have any documentation such as promissory notes or
    other evidence of the debt owed by Complainant to the trusts. The loans were all repaid.
    11. Respondent never advised the trust settlor or the beneficiaries of the trusts that he
    was loaning money from those trusts to the Complainant.
    12. Respondent charged Complainant and agreed to an interest rate often percent on
    the Loans that the trusts made to Complainant.
    13. Respondent kept five percent of the repaid interests for himself as a fee, in
    addition to the fees he charged the trusts for services rendered as Trustee.
    14. . The settlor became aware of the Loans to Complainant in 2013 and 2014 when he
    reviewed accountings that the Respondent had provided.
    15. The settlor, after retaining counsel, determined that Respondent had paid himself
    fees that were not reasonable or justified by keeping a portion of the earned interest on the Loans
    in addition to charging the trusts administration fees for acting as Trustee.
    16. Respondent and the settlor met to discuss the matters uncovered, and both agreed
    that Respondent would pay back $500,000.00 to the trust; the settlor did not join in this
    complaint.
    17. Respondent executed a promissory note on January 1, 2015 in the amount of
    $500,000.00 plus interest at 5% payable in 120 monthly installments to the 1998 trust
    ("Promissory Note").
    18. Respondent had paid back approximately $207,000.00 of the principal owed on
    the Promissory Note.

    II. NATURE OF MISCONDUCT

    Such conduct by Respondent constitutes misconduct in violation of the following
    provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct:

    RULE 1.5 Fees
    (a) A lawyer's fee shall be reasonable. The factors to be considered in determining the
    reasonableness of a fee include the following:
    (1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions
    involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly;
    (2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular
    employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;
    (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
    (4) the amount involved and the results obtained;
    (5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances;
    (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client;
    (7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the
    services; and
    (8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.
    (b) The lawyer's fee shall be adequately explained to the client. When the lawyer has not
    regularly represented the client, the amount, basis or rate of the fee shall be communicated to the
    client, preferably in writing, before or within a reasonable time after commencing the
    representation.
    * * * *

    RULE 1.7 Conflict of Interest: General Rule.
    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the
    representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists
    if:
    (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
    (2) there is significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be
    materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a
    third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.

    * * *

    RULE 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions
    (a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire
    an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:

    (1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and
    reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a
    manner which can be reasonably understood by the client;
    (2) the client is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advice of independent
    counsel in the transaction; and
    (3) the client consents in writing thereto.

    * * *

    RULE 1.15 Safekeeping Property

    (a) Depositing Funds.
    ( 1) All funds received or held by a lawyer or law firm on behalf of a client or a
    third party, or held by a lawyer as a fiduciary, other than reimbursement of advances for
    costs and expenses shall be deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts; all other
    property held on behalf of a client should be placed in a safe deposit box or other place of
    safekeeping as soon as practicable.
    (2) For lawyers or law firms located in Virginia, a lawyer trust account shall be
    maintained only at a financial institution approved by the Virginia State Bar, unless
    otherwise expressly directed in writing by the client for whom the funds are being held.
    (3) No funds belonging to the lawyer or law firm shall be deposited or maintained
    therein except as follows:
    (i) funds reasonably sufficient to pay service or other charges or fees
    imposed by the financial institution or to maintain a required minimum balance to
    avoid the imposition of service fees, provided the funds deposited are no more
    than necessary to do so; or
    (ii) funds in which two or more persons (one of whom may be the lawyer)
    claim an interest shall be held in the trust account until the dispute is resolved and
    there is an accounting and severance of their interests. Any portion finally
    determined to belong to the lawyer or law firm shall be withdrawn promptly from
    the trust account.

    (b) Specific Duties. A lawyer shall:

    (1) promptly notify a client of the receipt of the client's funds, securities, or other
    properties;
    (2) identify and label securities and properties of a client, or those held by a
    lawyer as a fiduciary, promptly upon receipt;
    (3) maintain complete records of all funds, securities, and other properties of a
    client coming into the possession of the lawyer and render appropriate accountings to the
    client regarding them;
    (4) promptly pay or deliver to the client or another as requested by such person
    the funds, securities, or other properties in the possession of the lawyer that such person
    is entitled to receive; and
    (5) not disburse funds or use property of a client or third party with a valid lien or
    assignment without their consent or convert funds or property of a client or third party,
    except as directed by a tribunal.

    III. PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS

    Accordingly, having approved the agreed disposition, it is the decision of the
    Subcommittee to impose a PUBLIC Reprimand with Terms. The terms are:
    1. Respondent shall have all of his trust accounts kept in accordance with Rule 1.15
    and other fiduciary accounts audited twice a year, at his expense, by a Certified Public
    Accountant authorized to conduct such audits in Virginia. The audits shall be performed for a
    two year period beginning on the date of the issuance of the disposition imposing the Public
    Reprimand with Terms set forth herein.
    2. The Certified Public Accountant shall submit a written report to the Bar Counsel
    of the biannual audits certifying that all of Respondent's trust and fiduciary accounts are in
    compliance with Rule 1.15 of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Such reports shall be
    submitted to bar counsel with 30 days of the expiration of every six-month period.
    3. Within 60 days of the date of the issuance of the disposition imposing Public
    Reprimand with terms, Respondent shall provide to Bar Counsel a written status report
    indicating the status of the Promissory Note Respondent executed to pay back the Trust monies
    he overcharged in fees. If the Promissory Note is not current, Respondent shall bring the Note
    current within 30 days of his report to Bar Counsel and provide a further written certification
    attesting to the fact that the has brought the Promissory Note Current.
    4. Respondent shall thereafter continue to repay the Promissory Note in full as a
    condition of this sanction of Public Reprimand with Terms.
    5. If the Respondent does not continue to keep the Promissory Note current, then he
    shall be in breach of the terms of this Public Reprimand with Terms.
    If any of the terms are not met by the time specified, pursuant to Part 6, § IV, ,r 13-15.F
    of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the District Committee shall hold a hearing and
    Respondent shall be required to show cause why a Certification for Sanction Determination
    should not be imposed. Any proceeding initiated due to failure to comply with terms will be
    considered a new matter, and an administrative fee and costs will be assessed.
    Pursuant to Part 6, §IV,, 13-9.E. of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the
    Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall assess costs.

    FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE
    OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
    Veronica E. Meade, Esq.
    Subcommittee Chair

    Comments

    ONLY A PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS WAS IMPOSED BY THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR.

    BASED ON MULTIPLE BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTIES INVOLVING THE COMMINGLING OF CLIENT FUNDS WITH THE FUNDS OF FERGUSON, RAWLS & RAINES, P.C AND EXCESSIVE FEES INVOLVING AT LEAST FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.0) WHICH WOULD USUALLY RESULT IN A SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF AN ATTORNEY'S RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW IN VIRGINIA.

    PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS ONLY DISCIPLINE & E. GRIER FERGUSON, ESQUIRE, WAS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE PRACTICING LAW AND SERVE AS A FIDUCIARY IN MANY OTHER MATTERS INVOLVING LARGE SUMS OF FUNDS.

    Document Links 1 (Scribd et. al)

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj2iqLYvLnqAhX1l3IEHZGZDV8QFjAAegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vsb.org%2Fdocs%2FFerguson-112019.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2XoZkubzhXLejq5mGbwU0b

    Document Link 2

    https://frrlaw.com/our_attorneys/e-grier-ferguson

    Document Link 3

    https://frrlaw.com/

    mood_bad
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Government Grievance Virginia Courts are Racist, Predatory and Dishonest

    • Virginia IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR COUNTY OF ORANGE
    • CL 2100 0427 - 00 Jury Trial Demanded
    • Government Grievance
    • TBD

    Justin Wolfe Prince William County Virginia Sentenced to Death in Virginia on a LIE

    • Prince William County Circuit Court
    • CR 0505048900
    • Death Row Case - Murder for Hire
    • Chief Judge Mary Grace O'Brien

    Justin Wolfe Prince William County Virginia Sentenced to Death in Virginia on a LIE

    • Prince William County Circuit Court
    • CR 0505048900
    • Death Row Case - Murder for Hire
    • Chief Judge Mary Grace O'Brien
    Donate with Paypal
    Go Fund Me
    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Blogger

    Judicial Pedia follows The Constitution of the United States of America which  is the Supreme Law of the United States.    The First Amendment:     Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Judicial Pedia gives every American a place to exercise The First Amendment.But, when you post and submit a case you agree to the following:   When this form is submitted.The party giving the written statement declares the facts / information stated are true and confirms this to the best of their knowledge. The party confirms that the information here is both accurate and relevant information has not been omitted.

    Liberty Bell

    The Liberty Bell reads:

    "Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof." from Leviticus 25:10.

    Let us continue to "RING" the BELL for Justice.

    • Explore
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us

    © Judicial Pedia. All rights reserved.

    person
    Sign in
    personDon't have an account?
    lockForgot password?
    person
    Create an account

    IMPORTANT NOTICE: After registering your account, please check your email and click on the confirmation, then return to the website and log back in with the username and password you received in your email.

    PRIVACY POLICY: Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.

    Already Registered?

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • WhatsApp
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link